Friday, March 13, 2015

Hillary has another explanation

BULLY BOY PRESS &    CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL AID TABLE

CRANKY CLINTON'S STEPPED IN IT YET AGAIN.

AFTER WEAVING A COLORFUL TALE REGARDING HER E-MAILS AND INSISTING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE JUST HAD TO TRUST HER, TURNS OUT SHE WAS BEING DISHONEST AND LYING YET AGAIN.

REACHED FOR COMMENT, HILLARY SNAPPED AT THESE REPORTERS, "LOOK, NO ONE EXPECTS ME TO BE HONEST AT FIRST! EVERY ONE KNOWS I AM GOING TO LIE.  THAT'S WHAT I DO.  THAT'S WHO I AM.  AND THAT'S WHY AMERICA SHOULD VOTE FOR ME."

AT THAT POINT, HILLARY EMITTED A SCREAM AND BIT THE HEAD OFF A SMALL CHILD BEFORE SCURRYING OFF UNDER A ROCK.


FROM THE TCI WIRE:



On the Thursday broadcast of ABC World News with David Muir, Iraq was covered:

David Muir: Now to new fall out after our ABC investigation last night. It involves the fight against ISIS known for those awful videos, lining up their victims on the beach.  And now a new concern.  Are some of the Iraqi forces -- trained and paid for by US taxpayers -- using techniques that are just as brutal?  Well the State Dept tonight responding to our report and ABC's chief investigative reporter Brian Ross back on the job tonight.

Brian Ross:  The State Dept called these scenes today serious and distuuing.  Brutal images of what appear to be Iraqi forces and militias carrying out, celebrating, torture and beheadings.  In this torture scene, two US weapons against the wall. This video shows two civilians, pleading for their lives, about to be shot dead.  A man with an American supplied weapon walks by, a gunman with what appears to be the insignia of Iraqi Special Forces caught on tape.

US State Dept spokesperson Jen Psaki: Their behavior must be above reproach or they risk being painted with the same brush as ISIL fighters.


Brian Ross:  The Pentagon says it has already cut off money to some Iraqi units because of gross human rights violations.  But Senator Patrick Leahy says the ABC News report shows the government should cut off money to more Iraqi units.

Senator Patrick Leahy: When you look at at the videos and look at the uniforms being worn, do we really want to say the US condones that?

Brian Ross: US officials tonight tell ABC News that America's top military leader Gen Martin Dempsey, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, has repeatedly warned Iraqi leaders about the conduct of the Iraqi military and the militias that fight with them -- especially because the US is sending $1.5 billion to the Iraqi army and almost 3,000 American troops to help train them.


At the link, you'll find not only the video report, but also a text article and a photo essay.  James Gordon Meek, Brian Ross, Rym Momtaz and Alex Hosenball did the previous ABC News report on this topic.

The Jen Psaki moment in the transcript above is from today's State Dept press briefing.

Jen is shown looking down at her notebook and reading a pre-written statement.

She's ridiculous and shameful.  Let's move to that moment at today's briefing:



QUESTION: There’s some really disturbing images coming out of Iraq, which appear to show uniformed Iraqi soldiers committing atrocities – beheadings, torture. Are you – I mean, Iraq has said they’re investigating. Do you have confidence in their investigation, their ability to investigate this alone? Will you, the State Department, do any investigating? That’s the first question.


MS. PSAKI: Sure. Well, these are clearly disturbing and serious allegations, ones that we’ve, unfortunately, spoken about many times before, including from this podium, because we’ve been – there have been a range of reports out there for some time about these types of abuses. So we’re, of course, deeply concerned by the reports. The Iraqi Government, as you mentioned, has indicated that it will investigate to determine the facts behind these claims. We urge it to conduct a transparent, thorough, and timely investigation.
I would also note that Prime Minister Abadi, I think including in his inaugural remarks, spoke about this, has stated that he – not about this specifically, but about efforts to kind of address unregulated militias, which is part of the problem – has stated that he has a zero-tolerance policy of human rights abuses by any security element. U.S. officials from Washington and Baghdad continue to raise our concerns with senior Government of Iraq officials, and we have been doing that for some time.
This behavior is clearly – their behavior must be above reproach or they risk being painted with the same brush as ISIL fighters. And certainly that’s a message that we are making clear. But they’ve indicated they’re investigating. There’s no plans for the United States Government to investigate, no.


QUESTION: Okay. But do they not also risk, then, the U.S. sort of cutting off funding and pulling out of the coalition and sort of stopping their involvement?


MS. PSAKI: Well, we have withheld assistance from certain Iraqi units on the basis of credible information in the past. There’s an entire process of review that happens. And certainly if new information surfaced that warranted that – the Leahy law being put into effect, we would do the same thing.


QUESTION: Right. So unlikely that you would – as a result of these types of crimes, if proven true – I mean, there’s images supporting them at this point. But if proven true, it’s unlikely that you would do some sort of broad pullout of Iraq as a result, just stopping financing to certain brigades?



MS. PSAKI: Well, there are laws in place, that have been in place for time, that we have applied to some Iraqi units. And certainly we would continue to apply those if applicable. Obviously we look at any information that was available, including reports and media reports as well. But I’m not going to prejudge what that would mean in the future.


That's not the law and the State Dept looks like a pack of idiot War Criminals right now.

The US government is not allowed to pick and choose -- per the law -- which parts of a military they give assistance to.  The law is that when incidents like the above take place, the US government has to cut off all military assistance.

That's the law.

I thought Jen was leaving.  I thought she was taking her lying to the White House?

After today, she can't leave soon enough.

There is spin and there is whoring.


We've been rather kind to Jen here.  Marie Harf, not so much.  But Jen's largely gotten a pass because she's usually been professional not whorish.

When she stands in front of the press and lies through her teeth about the law -- to cover for War Crimes -- she's nothing but a cheap whore.

She has no shame and she clearly has no ethics.

The Leahy Amendment does not say: If the government the US is sending military aid to has human rights abuses (War Crimes), the US government must ensure that the 'good' elements of the military receive money and weapons.

The law says when these human rights abuses take place, the aid is to be immediately cut.

The State Dept is a disgrace today.

John Kerry's confused himself with Secretary of Defense throughout his tenure as Secretary of State.

It is shameful.

And it should be criminal for a spokesperson to lie about what the law says.




Recommended: "Iraq snapshot"
"So much of the administration's testimony yesterda..."
"If I were a lawyer for the Iranian government . . ."
"Why Brian Williams shouldn't return to NBC Nightly News"
"Iran in Iraq"
"Brief"
"Greenwald"
"Is Jim Lobe the biggest bitch in the world?"
"margaux's bugger and a dumb plot point (revenge)"
"About the hearing coverage"
"Hillary's e-mails"
"Hillary thinks we're stupid"
"Well it's her idea of fun"
"THIS JUST IN! WHO CAN RELATE TO CRANKY CLINTON!"


Thursday, March 12, 2015

Well it's her idea of fun

BULLY BOY PRESS &    CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL AID TABLE

BIG DOG BILL CLINTON GOT TAKEN DOWN FOR SAYING HE DIDN'T HAVE SEX WITH MONICA LEWINSKY WHEN HE DID BUT HIS BORING HALF MAY GET TAKEN DOWN FOR THE CLAIM THAT SHE DIDN'T SEND CLASSIFIED E-MAILS TO ANYONE ON THE PRIVATE SERVER SHE USED FOR HER PRIVATE ACCOUNT.

CRANKY CLINTON JUST ISN'T BELIEVABLE AS SOMEONE CONSUMED BY PASSION BUT AMERICA WILL BUY HER AS THE CRANKY FOOL SENDING OUT NATIONAL SECRETS IN HER E-MAILS.

REACHED FOR COMMENT, CRANKY DECLARED SHE WAS "POURING OVER SPREAD SHEETS.  HA! I WAS UP TILL 4 THIS MORNING RUNNING ACTUARY NUMBERS!  THAT'S THE SORT OF THING THAT GETS MY JUICES FLOWING, I TELL YOU!  I THINK, FOR FUN TONIGHT, I'LL PULL OUT SOME PIE CHARTS."



FROM THE TCI WIRE:


What happens when an angry Frankenstein faces Congress?


That was this morning at the Senate Armed Services Committee hearing where Secretary of State Kerry,  Secretary of Defense Ash Carter and Gen Martin Dempsey (Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff) provided testimony.

Or in Kerry's case, theatrics and laughter.

When not impatiently clicking his pen throughout the hearing, Kerry basically glowered -- as if the Committee were villagers carrying torches.

"I see a real danger of a ground troop creep here  converting this into not the region poliicing its own terrorism but like the air strike campaign that's 80% US, it's a US mission," declared Senator Tim Kaine in the hearing.

This resulted in a forced chuckle by Kerry.

It didn't result in any real answer.

Of course not.

Kerry can't even get honest that everyone in the administration is waiting on Gen Lloyd Austin's recommendation which the military chiefs expect will be for US troops in an on the ground combat role -- this was addressed -- again -- in yesterday's Senate Armed Services Committee hearing covered in Tuesday's snapshot.  From yesterday:


Senator Lindsey Graham:  Do you agree with me that the best way that you guarantee that you destroy and degrade ISIL is that you have some American ground forces to help the regional forces?


Gen Joseph Dunford Jr.: Senator, uh, right now, uh, I think it's critical that we provide US support.  And I think, as you know, we're waiting for Gen [Lloyd]  Austin to make a recommendation as to exactly what that support would be.




John Kerry found Kaine's question hilarious.

This despite the fact that Kaine's remarks are similar to what many leaders in the region have said and have told Congress.  King Abdullah II of Jordan, for example, has noted this has to be a regional response and not a US dominated one.  For it to work, it has to be a regional response otherwise it is the West again attacking Iraq which only helps recruit opposition forces.

King rightly points out that while Kerry and other US officials insist the current war on Iraq is a coalition effort -- a coalition working with the government of Iraq -- the reality is that 80% of the air strikes are carried about by the US.

So if they can't get honest about that, why should the same US government officials be trusted when they claim that any efforts on the ground would be a coalition working with Iraq?

Most likely, as King points out, ground forces would be US troops with a few Iraqis and a handful of soldiers from other countries tossed in.

Though he can't get honest, John Kerry can lecture and did so repeatedly.

"So as long as we continue to work on the integration," he said waiving his clutched and unclutched right hand  throughout the air, "the  internal inclusivity of Iraq and its government -- to help the Iraqis to be able to do this themselves, help the region feel empowered by it, that is a long term recipe for the United States not to have as much risk and not to have to put ourselves on the line the way we have historically."

But that hasn't been done.

Iraq's Haider al-Abadi became prime minister in August and there's been nothing but empty talk.

He did finally get a budget passed.

Iraq's Parliament passed the 2015 budget on January 29, 2015.

And in August, this was going to happen before the end of September.

Didn't turn out that way.

In fairness to him, there is no 2014 budget.

Former prime minister and forever thug Nouri al-Maliki was never able to pass a 2014 budget.

But that's really all Haider has to point to.

The State Dept attempted to sell an 'oil deal' between the central government out of Baghdad and the Kurdish Regional Government as proof that Haider was being more "inclusive" than Nouri and as movement towards resolving Iraq's many crises that led to the current state of affairs.

However, that 'deal' is still not implemented.

It's nothing more than empty words from Haider al-Abadi.



RECOMMENDED:  "Iraq snapshot"
"ACLU Sues NSA to Stop Mass Internet Spying"
"Again reselling the Iraq War"
"A passing"
"Is there a bigger bitch than John Kerry (Wally)"
"How afraid of us is the US government?"
"John Kerry's become a bully and a bore (Ava)"
"Fat men always get TV shows"
"All Lives Matter"
"Hillary can sink like a stone"
"Look what it's led to"
"I honestly feel sorry for Barack Obama"
"NSA's illegal spying"
"John Kerry has a hissy"
"THIS JUST IN! AND THE HUFFY BIKE HE RODE IN ON!"


  • Wednesday, March 11, 2015

    John Kerry has a hissy



    BULLY BOY PRESS &    CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL AID TABLE


    TODAY ELDERLY SECRETARY JOHN KERRY APPEARED BEFORE THE CONGRESS LOOKING ALL GLUM LIKE SOMEONE FORGOT TO GIVE HIM A COFFEE MUG ON
    NATIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE PROFESSIONALS’ DAY.

    HE SLAMMED REPUBLICANS WHO WROTE A LETTER TO IRAN – A PUBLIC LETTER.

    REACHED FOR COMMENT AFTER THE HEARING BY THESE REPORTERS, KERRY BRISTLED WHEN REMINDED THAT WHILE RUNNING FOR THE PRESIDENCY IN 2004, HE INSISTED THAT THE FOREIGN LEADERS HE SPOKE TO PRIVATELY WANTED BULLY BOY BUSH TO LEAVE THE WHITE HOUSE.

    WHEN FURTHER REMINDED THAT HIS SECRET TALKS WERE CALLED OUT, KERRY INSISTED THAT THEY WERE “SECRET – SEE IT WAS GOSSIP.  AND EVERYONE KNOWS I’M A CATTY GOSSIP.  SO THAT’S THE DIFFERENCE.”

    AS HE STORMED OFF HE NOTED HE DIDN’T EVEN GET A CARD TODAY.

    THESE REPORTERS ATTEMPTED TO INFORM HIM THE HOLIDAY DID NOT ROLL AROUND UNTIL MARCH 22ND BUT HE HAD HAD ALREADY STORMED OFF.

        •  


    This morning, US Senator John McCain declared, "Indeed, all four of the military service chiefs have testified that defense spending at sequestration levels would put American lives at risk. Now more than ever, a strong Navy and Marine Corps are essential to our nation's ability to deter adversaries, assure allies and defend our national interests."


    He was speaking at a budget hearing the Senate Armed Services Committee was holding.  Mccain is the Chair of the Committee, Senator Jack Reed is the Ranking Member.  The witnesses appearing before them were Gen Joseph Dunford Jr (Commandant of the Marine Corps), Secretary of the Navy Raymond Mabus Jr. and Adm John Greenert (Chief of Naval Operations).

    We'll come back to the hearing in a moment.

    But let's think about what the Chair was saying.

    Not in terms of the US but in terms of Iraq.

    Nouri al-Maliki was prime minister of Iraq from 2006 - 2014.  There were no real public works programs to repair Iraq's crumbling infrastructure.  There were times when the yearly budget was such that Nouri could have given every Iraqi citizen in the country a billion dollars.  But didn't.

    The money also didn't go to help address Iraq's problems -- such as the severe shortage of nurses and doctors (but especially nurses).  Instead, Nouri was fine with bringing in nurses from other countries.

    This despite double-digit unemployment in Iraq and a severe need for employment.

    Now there was money for Nouri's son to amass a fleet of sports cars in London as well as a bachelor pad where he -- contrary to the strict Shi'ite beliefs Nouri is supposed to hold (supposed to) -- entertained woman after woman.  There was money for Nouri's son to party.

    But there was no money spent on the Iraqi people.

    Nouri created his own political slate and dubbed it State and Law.

    The point being, Nouri insisted, he was law and order and restoring that to Iraq.

    And he ran in 2010 on the (false) claim that he'd restored order to Iraq.

    The one thing he did pour money into was the Iraqi forces.

    (Not the Peshmerga.  The Kurdish Regional Government paid the Peshmerga out of their portion of the national budget.)

    In fact, the Iraqi forces were so 'covered' by Nouri, he was able to say, "I got this."

    He was able to say, "I got this" -- and to refuse to US training for them.


    This was noted in the November 30, 2011 House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on the Middle East and South Asia hearing on Iraq.  We covered it in the next day's snapshot (December 1, 2011).  The Ranking Member, US House Rep Gary Ackerman, noted how the US training program was being publicly rebuked by the Ministry of the Interior.  They did not want or need US trainers.  That was made clear.  (There was no Minister of the Interior.  Nouri refused to nominate anyone for the post so that he could control the Ministry himself.)

    They didn't show up for training, these forces.

    What's changed since then?

    Not much.

    CBS News reported Monday:


    CBS News correspondent Holly Williams reports there are already more than 2,500 U.S. military advisers and trainers in Iraq, but Dempsey said their work is being hindered by the fact that Iraqi units sometimes fail to show up for training, or arrive without the proper equipment.

    "Right now we don't need more advisers on the ground," Dempsey told reporters on board the French aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle, alongside his counterpart French Gen. Pierre de Villiers.
    "We've got trainers and advisers that are waiting for some of the Iraqi units to show up, and when they've shown up -- a handful of them -- they've shown up understrength and sometimes without the proper equipment. The Iraqi government can actually fix that themselves," said Dempsey.


    Back at the 2011 hearing when Ackerman was noting the Iraqi forces didn't want US training, he also noted that the Iraqi forces were unable to provide security to the country by themselves as he questioned the State Dept's Brooke Darby:
    Ranking Member Gary Ackerman: When will they be willing to stand up without us?
    Brooke Darby: I wish I could answer that question.
    Ranking Member Gary Ackerman: Then why are we spending money if we don't have the answer?
    [long pause]

    Ranking Member Gary Ackerman: You know, this is turning into what happens after a bar mitzvah or a Jewish wedding. It's called "a Jewish goodbye."  Everybody keeps saying goodbye but nobody leaves.


    When will they be able to stand up?


    Not then.

    And apparently still not now.

    In fairness to them, it turns out some of Nouri's spending was wasted on corruption and on paying people for service that they were not actually performing.

    But the US is yet again working on training.

    Iraqi forces, by themselves, are still not able to meet the goals McCain expects from US allies: "to deter adversaries, assure allies and defend our national interests."

    Recommended: “Iraq snapshot






    Tuesday, March 10, 2015

    It's all about my needs says Hillary

    BULLY BOY PRESS &    CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL AID TABLE

    CRANKY CLINTON TOOK TO THE UNITED NATIONS TODAY TO INSIST SHE HAD DONE NOTHING WRONG AND BESIDES SHE WAS JUST TRYING TO DO WHAT WAS "CONVENIENT" FOR HER.

    NEVER MIND WHAT WAS BEST FOR THE GOVERNMENT OR THE COUNTRY.

    IT WAS ALL ABOUT HER PERSONAL CONVENIENCE.


    FUNNY, WHEN SHE WAS SWORN IN, THERE WAS NO TALK OF 'DOING THE JOB TO THE BEST OF MY PERSONAL CONVENIENCE.'

    THERE WAS A CRYING BABY.

    .
    THE WOMAN WHO WANTS TO BE PRESIDENT DIDN'T CARE ENOUGH ABOUT HER JOB AS SECRETARY OF STATE TO DO WHAT WAS NEEDED, ONLY WHAT WAS CONVENIENT.  WHAT A SELLING POINT FOR HER CAMPAIGN.

    AND FOR NOW?

    CRANKY CLINTON ANNOUNCED TODAY SHE WOULD NOT BE TURNING OVER HER SERVERS.

    IN OTHER WORDS, SHE'S NOT BEING OPEN, SHE'S NOT BEING HONEST BUT SHE WANTS YOUR VOTE SO SHE CAN TAKE HER CORRUPTION TO THE TOP!



    FROM THE TCI WIRE:



    Prensa Latina reports, "US Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Martin Dempsey said today that the self proclaimed Islamic State for Syria and Iraq, ISIS will be defeated at the same time that the local government increases is offensive against Tikrit and Al-Anbar."

    Is that what he said?

    If that's what he said, he's an idiot.

    As many observers have pointed out -- to stick only with Tikrit -- Iraq grabbing control of it from the Islamic State doesn't matter as much as what happens the day after liberation or 'liberation.'

    Is there a reason for Sunnis to buy in?  A reason for them to feel the government out of Baghdad is a representative one.

    Dempsey usually makes remarks about the need for a political solution.

    Maybe he forgot.

    Or maybe Prensa Latina got it wrong.

    Robert Burns (AP) reports, "Before arriving in the Iraqi capital, Dempsey said that he wanted to press the Shiite-dominated government to deliver on its promise to reconcile with the Sunni minority and to explain how it intends to balance its relations with Iran."


    It's a shame that the Pentagon failed to release a transcript of the press conference.

    It might have cleared up some errors.

    Might have even mitigated some of the reactions to the press briefing.


    At Rudaw's report on Dempsey's remarks at the press conference, the most popular reader comment is this:


    They're spinning the story, what's happened is the Iranians have instructed Baghdad to get rid of the Americans, all of it, the air support, bases, training etc. and now the Americans are doing damage control, trying to save face. Fist they claimed Baghdad is not requesting more air support, now they're claiming that they want to "avoid civilian casualties", they have no such concerns in Syria or Yemen or Afghanistan. A month ago the Pentagon and the administration declared that they were planing to send additional advisers, special forces and around 4000 marines to Iraq, this past week they've changed their tone completely, even today Dempsey said Iraq "doesn't need" more US trainers or advisories.                      



    Before anymore US troops are sent to Iraq, it would be good to know how the missing is seen in the region and in Iraq.  Not how it's seen by the US appointed and anointed rulers in Iraq, but by the people.


    In America, some are saying the people have spoken.  For example, Andrew Tilghman (Military Times) writes, "According to a Rasmussen poll in early February, 52 percent of Americans believe the U.S. should send 'send combat troops back to Iraq as part of an international coalition to fight ISIS.' That's up from 48 percent in October. Meanwhile, the percentage of those opposed fell 8 points, to 28 percent from 36 percent in October."

    A few problems.

    "International coalition" isn't defined.

    Second, Rasmussen?

    Seriously.

    I believe, correct me if I'm wrong, their polling had Mitt Romney winning the 2012 election.

    For those who've forgotten, Mitt Romney lost that election to Barack Obama.


    Whatever the actual figure, I don't doubt that it's increased since October.

    The US media's been selling fear non-stop since then.

    It's attempted to stir up the public.  It's featured 'talkers' who've predicted mayhem on the streets of America from the Islamic State despite the fact that it's really not possible.

    Homegrown terrorists launching an attack on US soil?

    Very possible.

    It's even possible that they might be terrorists who are sympathetic to the Islamic State.

    But the Islamic State having fighters to spare, fighters who can easily cross into the US?

    Not as simple as the talkers would insist.


    RECOMMENDED: "Iraq snapshot"
    "Afghan Girls Need Your Support Today (Feminist Maj..."
    "Everybody wants to play Empire (remember, it's not..."
    "Isaiah's The World Today Just Nuts "Hillary's Camp..."
    "Hejira"
    "Isaiah's The World Today Just Nuts "Hillary Teache..."
    "Isaiah's The World Today Just Nuts "Hillary's E-ma..."
    "International Women’s Day 2015 Let’s Save Our Wome..."
    "No to the racist backlash over Isis - former Guant..."
    "The so-called Good Wife"
    "When does it ever end?"
    "Oh, those scandals"
    "Left to choke on her own words"
    "Hillary plots response"
    "Liar James Carville"
    "Fox really has nothing for me this summer"
    "Oh, Hillary, buy a clue"
    "Hillary tries to figure out what to say"
    "hillary needs to get honest"



  • Truest statement of the week
  • Truest statement of the week II
  • A note to our readers
  • Editorial: A video tells ten billion words
  • TV: The only thing worse than bad TV is the Water ...
  • Oh, Sheila
  • What a sad five years for Ms. Blog (Ava and C.I.)
  • Radio worth applauding
  • This edition's playlist
  • No to the racist backlash over Isis - former Guant...
  • International Women's Day 2015 Let's Save Our Wome...
  • David DeGraw's Transcendental Element
  • The Center for Reproductive Rights issued the fol...
  • Highlights



  • "How Hillary intends to fight back on the scandal"
    "THIS JUST IN! HILLARY HAS A PLAN!"




    Sunday, March 08, 2015

    How Hillary intends to fight back on the scandal

    BULLY BOY PRESS &    CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL AID TABLE

    AS THE HILLARY CLINTON E-MAIL SCANDAL CONTINUES, CLAIMS EMERGE THAT THE E-MAILS WOULD REVEAL PAY-TO-PLAY -- A FOREIGN COUNTRY DONATES TO THE CLINTON FOUNDATION AND GETS HILLARY TO ADVOCATE FOR THAT COUNTRY'S WANTS WITHIN THE STATE DEPARTMENT.

    REACHED FOR COMMENT, CRANKY CLINTON INSISTED TO THESE REPORTERS THAT SHE HAD NOTHING TO HIDE.

    ASKED HOW SHE WOULD BACK UP THAT ASSERTION, SHE REPLIED, "I DON'T HAVE TO.  AMERICA LOVES ME.  THOSE STUPID FOOLS WILL BELIEVE WHATEVER I TELL THEM!  GOTTA' GO, I'M INSTAGRAMMING!"



    FROM THE TCI WIRE:




    February 26th, the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee heard from the VA led by Secretary Robert McDonald, we covered part of the hearing in Thursday's snapshot.  McDonald is in his seventh month on the job.  He replaced Eric Shinseki who resigned in disgrace.  As Ranking Member Richard Blumenthal told McDonald in the hearing, "That has been one of the downfalls of the VA to this point, the lack of reliable truthful information.  It was the downfall of your predecessor."


    It was noted throughout the hearing and it sort of left a question mark hanging over whatever limited information the VA was able to provide in the hearing.  Blumenthal is the Ranking Member and Senator Johnny Isakson is the Chair.  The hearing was about the VA's budget request and the first panel was composed of VA employees led by McDonald.  The others were Dr. Carolyn Clancy, well known fabulist Allison Hickey, Ronald Walters, Stephen Warren and Helen Tierney.


    Senator Patty Murray is a long serving member of the Committee and is a former Chair of the Committee.  She and Senator Dean Heller sponsored the Women Veterans Access to Quality Care Act of 2015.


    Senator Patty Murray:  Secretary McDonald, as you know and as you said in your opening statement, the population of women veterans is increasing dramatically, it's doubled since 2001. I was really pleased to work with Senator Heller to introduce the Women's Veterans Access to Quality Care Act to make sure that the VA does have the services and the facilities to meet the needs of women veterans.  One of the key positions of that bill is requiring obstetrics and gynecology to be available at every medical center.  I wanted to ask you what resources and staff -- including support staff -- will you need to meet that requirement?

    Secretary Robert McDonald: Thank you, Senator Murray.  We've very much in favor of that -- of that approach.  We're in the process of putting, uh, women's clinics all over the country.  We have a new one here in Washington, D.C. and I'd like to invite the members of the Committee to visit it.  Uhm, it's in our Washington, D.C. facility, it's a women's clinic.  Uh, as you know, I've been out to about 12 medical schools, talked to deans.  I'm -- We're hiring.  And we need to hire more gynecologists --

    Senator Patty Murray:  Do you -- Do you know how many you would need to --

    Secretary Robert McDonald:  Exact number --

    Senator Patty Murray (Con't):  -- to do this?

    Secretary Robert McDonald:  I don't have an exact number.  I can tell you that in the past -- the past nine months or so, we've hired about 8,000 people.  Of that, about 1,000 are doctors.  But I don't have how many of that are, uh, gynecologists --

    Senator Patty Murray:  Okay, if you can get --

    Senator Robert McDonald (Con't):  -- with that --

    Senator Patty Murray (Con't): -- that for me and get back with me on that.  


    And this is what frustrates me regarding the hearings.

    McDonald doesn't have basic information?

    He's got a team siting with him at the table and they don't have the information.

    Forget not know -- they should know it -- but they're not able to flip through their paperwork in front of them and pull out the figure?

    And the team McDonald has sitting behind him at the hearing can't whisper the information to him?

    Because, throughout the hearing, the people behind him were feeding him figures and statistics.

    When they don't feed on that, when no one at the table volunteers, it doesn't look like people just do not know, it plays like they don't want to share the information.

    As Ranking Member Blumenthal and others noted throughout the hearing, Shinseki himself complained, when resigning, that he was not given accurate information from those in the VA reporting to him.

    So you'd assume McDonald would be focusing on nailing down information.

    If you're aware that approximately 8,000 people have been hired and 1,000 are doctors, knowing how many are OB-GYNs should not be a mystery.

    Though he didn't supply a number, with 1,000 being doctors.


    There are 152 VA medical centers and if we add in VA outpatient clinics, we're left with nearly 1,000 facilities.  (We could also add in the nursing home care units and domiciliaries.)

    So there is an issue of a serious lack of gynecologists at VA medical facilities and if only 1,000 doctors were hired, you probably didn't fulfill the needs.

    The hearing was February 26th.  The Women Veterans Access to Quality Care Act of 2015 was read and referred to Committee on February 12th.

    14 days later, you're not prepared to discuss it?  You don't anticipate discussing it?

    Let's go back:

    Senator Patty Murray:  One of the key positions of that bill is requiring obstetrics and gynecology to be available at every medical center.  I wanted to ask you what resources and staff -- including support staff -- will you need to meet that requirement?

    Secretary Robert McDonald: Thank you, Senator Murray.  We've very much in favor of that -- of that approach.  We're in the process of putting, uh, women's clinics all over the country.  We have a new one here in Washington, D.C. and I'd like to invite the members of the Committee to visit it.  Uhm, it's in our Washington, D.C. facility, it's a women's clinic.  Uh, as you know, I've been out to about 12 medical schools, talked to deans.  I'm -- We're hiring.  And we need to hire more gynecologists --

    Senator Patty Murray:  Do you -- Do you know how many you would need to --

    Secretary Robert McDonald:  Exact number --

    Senator Patty Murray (Con't):  -- to do this?

    Secretary Robert McDonald:  I don't have an exact number. 



    The VA was present to argue for the budget and what the budget needs are.

    The failure to be prepared to address this issue goes to the continued lack of respect for the needs of women veterans.


    Senator Patty Murray:  And I also just wanted to bring up the VA's policy, up-to-date -- It is way past time to VA's policies up-to-date with modern medicine and allow the VA to provide better fertility treatment -- including in vitro fertilization for seriously injured veterans who want to start a family.  This is a high priority for me.  I think it is a high priority for our veterans and I want to work with you to get that done so I'll be talking to you more on that.

    Senator Robert McDonald:  Working on it.


    Senator Patty Murray:  Okay, I want to hear from you.  What are you doing to work on this?


    Dr Carolyn Clancy: So my staff briefed me recently on how many women might be eligible and what would be the specific --

    Senator Patty Murray:  Well it's women and men. 

    Dr. Carolyn Clancy:  -- medical requirements.  Yes.  Uh, also compared what the Dept of Defense covers versus what we cover.  Or, actually, don't.  At the moment.  So, uhm, I sent them back with some more questions.  So we'll be happy to follow up with you.  

    Senator Patty Murray:  I'll submit some questions on this but I think this is absolutely critical for our men and women who serve overseas, lose their capability and we have to make sure they can start a family so I will be focused on this.  



    Again, the lack of respect for women veterans.

    An issue the VA has failed on is referred to, by a medical doctor -- no less, as an issue for women.

    Murray corrected her because Murray's worked on this issue repeatedly. She has spoken to many couple's effected by the issue.  She has Chaired hearings on this issue.

    She is informed.

    And she's done the work to be.

    Why hasn't Clancy?

    Check her official bio and ask yourself why she is so ignorant of this basic medical issue.

    And, please note, this ignorance is after, she maintains, "my staff briefed me on this issue."

    And let's note again, as Senator Murray has highlighted for several years now, the Defense Dept provides coverage for this to service members.  It's the VA that's failing to do so.





    RECOMMENDED:  "International Women’s Day 2015 Let’s Save Our Wome..."
    "No to the racist backlash over Isis - former Guant..."
    "Iraq snapshot"
    "Who got trapped in Afghanistan?"
    "Hillary's e-mails"
    "The Hollow Man"
    "Don't treat me like an idiot"
    "Carly Simon's Anticipation"
    "Who got arrested in Iraq?"
    "more thoughts on scandal"
    "Go away Brian Williams"
    "Diana Ross"
    "Hillary's scandal continues"
    "The Slap episode 4"
    "Tired Madonna"
    "Clinton's response"
    "THIS JUST IN! CLINTON SAYS SCANDAL IS A PLUS!"