Cedric's Big Mix: 2022-05-01

Thursday, May 05, 2022

Behind the scenes of that Supreme Court draft opinion

BULLY BOY PRESS & CEDRIC'S BIG MIX & THOMAS FRIEDMAN IS A GREAT MAN & ANN'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL AID TABLE

(PICTURED ABOVE, SUPREME COURT JUSTICES SAMUEL ALITO, BRETT KAVANAUGH AND CLARENCE THOMAS DISCUSS HOW TO PROTECT NEWBORN JUSTICE NEAL GORSUCH.)

REAL REASON BEHIND THE SHOCKING DECISION.

NOW IT CAN BE TOLD IN AN EXCLUSIVE -- MUST CREDIT BULLY BOY PRESS & CEDRIC'S BIG MIX & THOMAS FRIEDMAN IS A GREAT MAN & ANN'S BIG MIX -- SUPREME COURT JUSTICE BRETT KAVANAUGH HAS REVEALED THE REAL REASON BEHIND THE DRAFT OPINION THAT WOULD OVERTURN ROE V. WADE -- MUST CREDIT .BULLY BOY PRESS & CEDRIC'S BIG MIX & THOMAS FRIEDMAN IS A GREAT MAN & ANN'S BIG MIX

PER KAVANAUGH, THE JUSTICES HAD TO INTERVENE WHEN NEWBIE JUDGE NEIL GORSUCH ATTENDED A PARTY WITH A VERY PERSISTENT SENATOR JOSH HAWLEY AND, YES, IT WAS ONE OF THOSE PARTIES THAT HAWLEY HAS BEEN WARNING ABOUT. NEWBIE NEIL WAS HALF-WAY THROUGH HIS MALIBU COCONUT WHEN HE REALIZED SOMEONE SLIPPED SOMETHING IN THE DRINK.

NEXT THING HE KNEW, HE WOKE UP SPRAWLED IN FRONT OF THE TOILET IN A POSITION KAVANAUGH WOULD ONLY DESCRIBE AS "PRESENTING."

GORSUCH IMMEDIATELY HURRIED OVER TO JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS' HOME WHERE HE WAS LECTURED ABOUT THE VERY -- AND VERY REAL -- AND VERY MEDICAL ISSUE OF BUTT BABIES. WHAT FOLLOWED WAS A NEVEROUS TRIP TO THE GROCERY STORE BY GORSUCH WITH KAVANAUGH AND THOMAS ACCOMPANIYING HIM FOR MORAL SUPPORT.

TO EVERYONE'S RELIEF, THE TEST CAME BACK NEGATIVE.

HOWEVER, WHEN JUSTICE SAMUEL ALITO LEARNED OF THE CLOSE CALL, HE WAS MOST SHOCKED THAT THE JUSTICES HAD DISCUSSED TERMINATING A POTENTIAL PREGNANCY AND DONE SO WITHOUT HIM. TO PROTECT "LITTLE NEIL AND OTHERS LIKE HIM," KAVANAUGH EXPLAINED, ALITO INSISTED HE WAS OUTLAWING ALL

REACHED FOR COMMENT, GORSUCH CONFIRMED THE GIST OF THE CONVERSATION TO THESE REPORTERS -- MUST CREDIT BULLY BOY PRESS & CEDRIC'S BIG MIX & THOMAS FRIEDMAN IS A GREAT MAN & ANN'S BIG MIX . HE FURTHER REVEALED THAT ALTHOUGH HE WAS SUPPORTING OVERTURNING ROE, SHOULD HE BECOME PREGNANT, HE WOULD STILL HAVE A D&C. HE ADMITTED HE WAS A LITTLE FOGGY ON SEX ED ("I WAS TAUGHT BY NUNS") BUT HE HAD NEVER HEARD OF BUTT BABIES BEFORE THOMAS ENLIGHTENED HIM ON THE TOPIC. "PRIOR TO THIS," GORSUCH EXCLUSIVELY TOLD US -- MUST CREDIT BULLY BOY PRESS & CEDRIC'S BIG MIX & THOMAS FRIEDMAN IS A GREAT MAN & ANN'S BIG MIX -- "I NEVER REALLY UNDERSTOOD THE MEANING OF THE TERM BACK ALLEY ABORTIONS. BACK ALLEY. I GET IT NOW. LEAVE IT TO CLARENCE TO KNOW ALL ABOUT IT."

FROM THE TCI WIRE

But we do tend to write a lot of things to fit however we want to see things.

I'm not going to offer nonsense about this justice lied!!! No. Susan Collins is an idiot. She proved that in 2002. She's a dumb idiot who hears what she wants to hear. Excepting her support for the Iraq War, I'm really not that vested in her one way or the other. And it's not fair to pin all the blame on her. The Democrats have done a lousy job and their work has been worse than Susan's.

But, for the future, don't hear what you want to hear. Examine the response youre getting.

Roe v Wade is settled law?

Yes, it is. Up until the Court chooses to hear a case on it. At which point, it is any judge's role to figure out if there is a conflict in the law, if the law applies, if . . . So you were an idiot -- this goes to various Democrats in the Senate and not just Republican Susan Collins -- hearing what you wanted to hear.

Quit nyou're whiing.

And if you produce a tape recording where some one on the Court promised you that they would enver vote to overturn Roe, first off we'd have ethical issues regarding your own behavior.

Second off, whether you like it or not Christian beliefs have had a significant role in the history of the US and one of those beliefs is redemption. Meaning, you can change. So let's use Alito. Alito promised not to overturn Roe (he didn't, this is a hypothetical) and Chuck Schumer has a recording of that office visit and makes it public.

After the outcry against Chuck died down, the point would be that Alito made a promise before he was a sitting Justice and he can easily argue that his opinion changed as his faith was renewed, as his faith grew, as he discovered a new religion, etc, etc.

And he wouldn't even have to bring in religion (but Alito would). He could merely argue that at that date in time, he meant what he said but that his years on the Court had increased his knowledge base and his opinons had changed.

So stop whining that you were lied to. And stop insisting that you had some promise before the justice sat on the Court Again, it's the law of the land (anything) up until you're asked to rule on it and then it is your role to interpret it and analyze it.

Again, don't ask for opinions if you 're not sure you want them. I'm not going to offer easy, pleasing takes that are devoid of reality.

If we're going to talk about this, we need to talk reality.

First off, no ruling has come down yet. Drafts are circulated all the time. The Justices confer and discuss and debate and some change their minds as a result of the give-and-take.

This draft may be destined for the trash heap.

That is not offered to say, "Cease working on this issue."

That is offered to say: Work smart.

Christine Pelosi thinks she's a feminist. She's not. Nepotism is not a feminist value. She's got a ton of opinions and they're all the opinions of entitled woman who has garnered every break the rich can receive in this country. She is not a learned mind.

As Margaret Kimberely has documented on her Twitter thread, when people were rightly noting that Ruth Ginsberg should step down, Christine showed up screaming sexism and ageism.

She was a stupid bitch then and she remains one today. Shooting out of Nancy Pelosi's vagina did not make Christine an expert on anything and we really don't need her faux wisdom.