Friday, July 17, 2015

She don't need no stinkin' voters!

BULLY BOY PRESS &     CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL AID TABLE


CRANKY CLINTON'S GOT PROBLEMS.

THE MORE PEOPLE SEE HER CAMPAIGN, THE MORE THEY REALIZE HOW DISHONEST SHE IS.


REACHED FOR COMMENT, CRANKY EXPLAINED SHE WAS OFF TO A BIG MONEY FUNDRAISER AND SHE DIDN'T "HAVE TIME FOR THOSE STUPID VOTERS RIGHT NOW.  WHEN I'M DONE RAKING IN THE DOUGH, I'LL TRY TO TAKE A MOMENT TO REMEMBER ALL THE LITTLE PEOPLE I STEPPED ON IN MY RISE TO THE TOP."


FROM THE TCI WIRE:

The assault on Anbar continues.

The press coverage?


Not so much.


Al Bawaba reports that the government of Jordan stated Iraq closed the border the two countries share, "A prolonged closure at Trebil crossing would cut off yet another export route for Jordan, dealing yet another blow to the country’s economy.  The kingdom closed its trade route with Syria after the crossing was seized by Syrian opposition this spring."  Mustafa Saad (Alsumaria) adds that Iraq's ambassador to Jordan, Jawad Hadi al-Abbas, stated today that the border was closed as a temporary measure which will end when the military operations to take back Anbar Province from the Islamic State.  Press TV notes:

Brigadier General Saad Maan said the move is partly aimed at depriving ISIL of the income it makes through taxing the cargo trucks driving through its territory inside Iraq.
Maan said the crossing will be reopened after the security situation improves in the area.


In a really lousy report for Reuters, Dominic Evans and Isabel Coles fail to note that border closing while insisting "tens of thousands" of civilians are trapped in Anbar.

Tens of thousands?

A conservative estimate of the population of Anbar is 1.6 million people.

Though some have been trapped near and outside Baghdad, it's not 700,000.

We're talking about a million civilians, minimum, trapped in Anbar as this 'operation' takes place.

A military operation in/on Anbar.

For 18 months now, the Iraq military has illegally been targeting civilians in Falluja with bombings -- resulting in thousands being injured and killed.

So the notion that the Iraqi military takes and care with a civilian population is a little beyond stretched.

This is a humanitarian crisis.


And maybe if the press could focus, this would be noted.

The press showed how distracted they were in today's State Dept press briefing as no one elected to ask a question -- to spokesperson John Kirby -- about Iraq.

Al Mada reports the military is stating that they have advanced to just outside Falluja city limits.

Even that doesn't result in western coverage of significance.

National Iraqi News Agency notes that Iraq's prime minister Haider al-Abadi visited Anbar Command.

Again, no major coverage came from that.



RECOMMENDED: "Iraq snapshot"
"Barack's Idiot Supporters"
"Don Cheadle"
"Julie Bowen again?"
"Jessica Lange"
"Edie Falco needs to retire"
"The best Emmy news"
"Taraji P. Henson"
"Grace of Monaco"
"The most competitive category"
"the return of friends!"
"Viola Davis"
"Cranky finds her role"
"THIS JUST IN! SHE'S THE MISCOMMUNICATOR!"



  •  
  • Thursday, July 16, 2015

    Cranky finds her role

    BULLY BOY PRESS &     CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL AID TABLE

    CRANKY WANTS TO BE THE GREAT MISCOMMUNICATOR.

    HER STUMBLES WITH THE PRESS HAVE BECOME HER HALLMARK.

    AND THIS IS SO TRUE THAT SHE  CONSIDERED MAKING HER CAMPAIGN SLOGAN, "THEY DON'T LIKE ME AND YOU WON'T EITHER!"


    BUT IT WAS DECIDED THAT WAS FAR TOO MUCH HONESTY FOR AN AMERICAN POLITICAL CAMPAIGN TO OFFER.




    FROM THE TCI WIRE:

    And the mark of a real bitch?

    Holding a press conference to sell something to the American people but being a bitch throughout.

    Yes, I'm referring to Barack's performance today.


    The only thing I can compare it to is when Joan Crawford was married to the CEO of Pepsi-Cola, Alfred Steele and felt the need to attend stock holder meetings like the one described in the May 14, 1958 issue of Variety where Joan insults the stockholders ("Make it brief, boy"), refuses to answer their questions ("It's none of your business") and thinks she was being professional and charming.



    The very first question led to this pompous response from Barack:

    Andrew, if you don't mind, just because I suspect that there’s going to be a common set of questions that are touched on -- I promise I will get to your question, but I want to start off just by stepping back and reminding folks of what is at stake here. And I already did in my opening statement, but I just want to reiterate it because I’ve heard already some of the objections to the deal.


    It never got better.


    And probably culminated in the exchange with CBS News' Major Garrett.


    Major Garrett:  Thank you, Mr. President. As you well know, there are four Americans in Iran -- three held on trumped-up charges, according to your administration; one, whereabouts unknown. Can you tell the country, sir, why you are content, with all the fanfare around this deal, to leave the conscience of this nation and the strength of this nation unaccounted for in relation to these four Americans?  And last week, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said, under no circumstances should there be any relief for Iran in terms of ballistic missiles or conventional weapons. It is perceived that that was a last-minute capitulation in these negotiations. Many in the Pentagon feel you’ve left the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff hung out to dry. Could you comment?


    President Barack Obama:   I got to give you credit, Major, for how you craft those questions. The notion that I am content as I celebrate with American citizens languishing in Iranian jails --  Major, that’s nonsense, and you should know better.  I’ve met with the families of some of those folks. Nobody is content. And our diplomats and our teams are working diligently to try to get them out.


    Eliza Collins covers the exchange for POLITICO and  Cedric's "He doesn't like questions" and Wally's "THIS JUST IN! HE DOESN'T CARE ABOUT HOSTAGES!" also covered the exchange.




    As for Barack's response, Major probably hit on the theme that historians will: Barack's capitulations.

    There are American hostages in Iran and, as president of the United States, you don't make a damn deal with any country that doesn't touch on American hostages being released.

    Barack has shown no respect for American lives and that's the historic thread.

    It connects this deal with the deal he made with the terrorist group the League of Righteous.

    Their leader and top officials were in US custody.  In the summer of 2009, Barack let them go.

    They now terrorize Sunnis in Iraq and that's on Barack.

    But he's never been asked to explain this.




    RECOMMENDED:  "Iraq snapshot"
    "Iran deal continues to dominate news coverage"
    "They look the other way"
    "If NBC can bring back Heroes . . ."
    "Chris Hedges on fake ass Bernie Sanders"
    "The joke that is Gene Lyons"
    "hillary sags"
    "Bernie the faux peace activist"
    "Iraq Tweet not to miss"
    "The truth about Bernie"
    "To be a Sunni in Iraq"
    "Gene Lyons needs to retire or just shut up"
    "He doesn't like questions"
    "THIS JUST IN! HE DOESN'T CARE ABOUT HOSTAGES!"





  • Wednesday, July 15, 2015

    He doesn't like questions

    BULLY BOY PRESS &     CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL AID TABLE

    BITCHY GIRL BARRY O GOT ALL PISSY TODAY WHEN A REPORTER, CBS' MAJOR GARRETT,  DARED TO ASK HIM ABOUT THE 4 AMERICANS HELD HOSTAGE BY IRAN.

    "YOU SHOULD KNOW BETTER!" SQUEALED BARRY O WHILE TUGGING ON HIS NAUGHTY PARTS.  "YOU SHOULD KNOW BETTER."

    ACTUALLY, BARRY O, IT'S YOU - YOU - YOU - YOU WHO OUGHT TO KNOW.


    FROM THE TCI WIRE:

    Nouri al-Maliki did his part to destroy Iraq and then some.

    The Iraqi Parliament wanted Ibrahim al-Jaafari to be prime minister following the December 2005 elections but the Bully Boy Bush administration opposed his being prime minister (for a second time) and instead installed Nouri al-Maliki in the spring of 2006.

    The CIA profile on Nouri suggested he would be a good fit for the job due to his paranoia which the US government could use to sway and to control him.

    It was his paranoia that marked his first time.

    Otherwise, he had no accomplishments to speak of.

    It was one failure after another for Nouri.

    For example, he promised the Iraqi people that the Bremer walls/blast walls the US put up around Baghdad in the summer of 2006 would come down immediately.

    That did not happen.

    For example, in 2007, he agreed to the White House's benchmarks for measuring success/progress in Iraq and then failed to complete the list.

    In the lead up to the 2010 elections, he had Shi'ite rivals kicked out of the election, he barred various Sunnis from running and he bribed and bribed again.

    His State of Law still lost to Ayad Allawi's Iraqiya.

    And Ayad should have been the next Prime Minister of Iraq.

    But Barack Obama played Supreme Court and turned Allawi into the new Al Gore as Barack installed the loser Nouri into a second term as prime minister.

    And then things really grew rotten.

    Despite repeatedly lying and insisting he would, Nouri wanted no power-sharing government and began demonizing all opponents.

    He then went after the people insisting peaceful protesters staging sit-ins were "terrorists."

    No one was safe in Nouri's second term and he unleashed his goons on the peaceful protesters (as well as on Members of Parliament) resulting in one violent incident after another.


    In 2010, the Iraqi people saw their votes overturned by US President Barack Obama.

    The Iraqi people saw their leaders attempt to create a representative government and fail. (Largely due to interference on the part of Barack Obama -- such as when the Parliament attempted to hold a vote of confidence on Nouri but the White House prevented it.)

    The Iraqi people then took to the streets to protest.

    For over a year, they protested -- with little attention from the world media.

    And Nouri responded by burning down the areas they gathered in.

    This is what gave rise to the Islamic State.

    A people who had been stripped of their votes, whose leaders were unable to protect them and who had attempted protest were denied every avenue of redress in a democracy.

    As the raving lunatic Nouri got more and more despotic,  even Barack had to step away.

    Which is how, in the fall of 2014, Haider al-Abadi became the new prime minister of Iraq after Nouri was forced out.

    But he wasn't forced too far.

    He became one of Iraq's three vice presidents and, in a typical Nouri narcissistic move,  Nouri declared himself the premier vice president.

    As usual, some idiots in the press corps went along with that lie.

    As we've noted before, Nouri will never stop attempting to destroy Iraq until he's six feet under.

    And he's used his time out of the post of prime minister (while remaining in the home of the prime minister, please note) to plot his return.


    This month, Ali Mamouri (Al-Monitor) reports on the latest developments in Nouri's possible efforts to take back the post of prime minister:


    During his rule, Maliki’s policy was characterized by its sectarian and divisive tone and was a key reason behind the recent military defeats in Mosul and Ramadi. Now Maliki is urging people to back away from the national reconciliation policy initiated by Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi when he took office. Proof of this is that during a tribal gathering June 13 in Karbala, Maliki said that the Anbar province’s tribes were protesting against him. He accused the rival political parties of supporting the objections against his rule when he was prime minister, which he called illegal. Finally, he described the fall of the Sunni areas at the hands of the Islamic State (IS) as “a Sunni sectarian revolution against the Shiites.”
    In his speech, Maliki used three forms of extremist thought to incite to sectarian conflict. First, regional division, by generalizing and accusing the tribes of a particular area of being all against the Iraqi government; second, deepening the political dispute by accusing his rivals of standing with the terrorists; and third, describing the dispute in Iraq as religious and sectarian.
    All three points contradict reality. There were tribes — such as the Sunni Albo tribe — in Anbar that were always against the protests and the ensuing developments, and the opposition parties to Maliki called for the peaceful resolution of the sit-ins and did not back those up. Finally, the Sunnis who were killed and displaced by IS exceed those from other communities; therefore, what happened cannot be described as a Sunni revolution against the Shiites.
    In another speech, on the anniversary of the Popular Mobilization Units June 13, Maliki seemed to have a strong belief in the conspiracy theory that the fall of Mosul at the hands of IS was brought about by internal parties — such as the Kurds and the Mosul Provincial Council — to overthrow his government. He clearly said that the denial of the conspiracy is a conspiracy in itself.



     
    This month has also seen Ibrahim Saleh (Niqash) report on what is seen as an effort to return Nouri al-Maliki to power:




    Recently there have been calls for major changes to the Iraqi political system, moving it from a parliamentary system to a presidential one. This would mean that rather than elected MPs in Baghdad choosing the country's President, voters would choose the President, who could then work somewhat separately from the also-elected Parliament. For example, the US is a presidential system. Iraq currently has a parliamentary system.
    However politicians in Iraq are concerned that if this comes any closer to happening that it will be a way for former Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki to slip back into power, but this time through a legal back door. They are also concerned that while it may not be something that can happen immediately, there is potential for some changes to occur during the next elections.
    The call for these changes were started by one of the Shiite Muslim militias involved in the fight against the extremist group known as the Islamic State. The group, League of the Righteous, or Asaib Ahl al-Haq in Arabic, is known to be closely linked with al-Maliki. It is also known to be one of the more hard line and extremist of the Shiite militias.


    Which is why many local politicians saw this as a call to bring al-Maliki, who is currently somewhat sidelined as one of Iraq's three Vice Presidents, back to power. Al-Maliki's divisive policies and attempts to centralise power have taken a fair share of the blame for the country's current security crisis and, although his party was successful in the last elections, al-Maliki lost the post of Prime Minister to colleague, Haider al-Abadi late last year.


    While Haider remains in power, he uses his time to seek "revenge" (his term) on the Islamic State.  The problem with seeking "revenge" (as opposed to seeking peace)?  You leave a lot of collateral damage in your wake.





    RECOMMENDED: "Iraq snapshot"
    "Isakson Statement on Announcement of Nuclear Agree..."
    "Barack honors Donna Mills, Haider al-Abadi seeks r..."
    "Is it a lemon?"
    "Rand on Iran deal"
    "The Thursday bloodbath continues"
    "on omar sharif's place in film history"
    "IF he's lost Wasserman Schultz . . ."
    "Late nigh talk shows"
    "Cult member DC Blogger"
    "No slam dunk"
    "Cypher"
    "Barack leaves the work to Joe"
    "She wears it her way"
    "THIS JUST IN! BOXERS AND BRIEFS!"




    Tuesday, July 14, 2015

    She wears it her way

    BULLY BOY PRESS &     CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL AID TABLE

    FORGET THE COMBAT BOOTS, CRANKY CLINTON WEARS GRANDMA PANTIES!

    REACHED FOR COMMENT TODAY BY THESE REPORTERS, CRANKY CONFIRMED WHAT THE PANTY LINES HAD LONG TOLD: SHE'S RETIRED FROM THE 'SPORT.'

    "COMFORT AND JOY, BOYS, COMFORT AND JOY!" SHE EXCLAIMED BEFORE ADDING THAT CLOSING THE CHAPTER ON HER SEXUAL LIFE WAS "LIBERATING AND TIME SAVING.  THESE DAYS, IT'S HAYNES FOR HER ALL THE WAY!"

    ASKED IF SHE WAS OFFENDED BY THE QUESTION, CRANKY SNORTED AND POINTED OUT HER HUSBAND WAS ASKED IN AN MTV 'DEBATE' BACK IN 1992 THE ETERNAL PRESSING QUESTION OF "BOXERS OR BRIEFS?"

    "FOR ME, ON A COLD DAY, IT'S BOTH!"


    FROM THE TCI WIRE:


    Today, Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi staged his latest attempt at taking (a part of) Anbar Province away from the Islamic State.  As Sinan Salaheddin (AP) observes:


    This is not the first time the Iraqi government has announced an operation to retake Anbar — where several key towns, including the provincial capital Ramadi, remain under IS control. In May, authorities announced an operation to retake Ramadi, but there has not been any major progress on the ground since then.



    Dominic Evans (Reuters) explains, "The sprawling Sunni Muslim province extends hundreds of kilometers west of Baghdad. Many of the towns and cities that line the banks of the Euphrates, snaking down from the Syrian border, are Islamic State strongholds.Islamic State's capture of Ramadi two months ago marked the biggest defeat for the Baghdad government since the militants swept through the north of the country last June and declared a caliphate in parts of Syria and Iraq straddling the border."

    AP has also noted that the announcement was made on Iraqi TV by Yahya Rasool who is the spokesperson for the Joint Operations Command but that he failed to "clarify whether the U.S.-led international coalition is taking part, mentioning only government forces and allied Shiite and Sunni paramilitary troops."  Failed to clarify or failed to credit?


    Al Jazeera's Imran Khan offered:

    We are hearing the province will be surrounded on three sides going up to the border with Syria. They have announced operations like this one in the past particularly in Ramadi when it was taken by ISIL forces in mid-May. And that's a battle that's still ongoing. It is likely that this operation will concentrate on the second city in Anbar province, Fallujah, and move further west. While this is going on, we have also heard coalition airstrikes have hit an ISIL media and radio station in Anbar province.



    What are they fighting for in Iraq?

    Freedom?

    Or the ability to carry out their own killings?

    Mitchell Prothero (McClatchy Newspapers) reports:


    Iraqi officials have been candid that the brunt of the fighting about to engulf the city will be borne by an umbrella group of Shiite militia groups formed under the supervision of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, the elite of Shiite Iran. That’s raised dire concerns from American advisers that these sectarian groups – overtly hostile to both Americans and Sunni Muslims – will break the already deeply frayed relationship between the Shiite government in Baghdad and the Sunni tribes that dominate the large swaths of Iraq currently under the Islamic State’s control.


    Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/world/article27167848.html#storylink=cpy
    The government claims that Sunni tribal fighters and local policemen from Anbar will join the militia-led assault. But many remain skeptical that Sunnis have joined in sufficient numbers to avoid the impression of a Shiite pogrom against Sunnis in Fallujah.


    Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/world/article27167848.html#storylink=cpy



    At the US State Dept press briefing today, spokesperson John Kirby spun wildly.


    QUESTION: Slightly Iran-related. In relation to Fallujah, wondering if the United States detects any evidence of Iranian involvement or direction of Shiite militia trying to take back Fallujah?


    MR KIRBY: I would point you to the Iraqi Government – this is an Iraqi-led operation – to speak to the participation of these Popular Mobilization Forces and certainly Tehran for the degree that they are or are not facilitating. I do think it’s important to remember a couple of things. This is an Iraqi-led operation, as it should be. And so we’re going to let them speak to the progress of it. And then on the Popular Mobilization Forces, and I mentioned this a week or so ago but I think it bears repeating: About 80 percent of these Popular Mobilization Forces, or Shia militia as they are otherwise known, are not at all connected to Tehran or the Iranian regime. They’re Iraqi citizens proud of their country and wanting to chip in and fight. And what we’ve said from the very beginning is that all the forces arrayed on the ground against ISIL in Iraq need to be under the command and control of the Iraqi Government. And that’s what we’ve seen with the vast majority of these Shia militiamen.

    So I think it’s just important to keep a little context in here. When we talk about Shia militia fighting here or fighting there, there’s this automatic sort of connection drawn to Tehran, and that’s just not the case mathematically.




    The assault on Anbar comes as the United Nations News Centre reports:


    The ongoing conflict in Iraq continues to exact a “terrible” and deadly toll on the country’s civilians, particularly in the areas still under control by the so-called Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), according to a new report released today by the United Nations.
    The report – a joint effort compiled by the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) and the UN Assistance Mission for Iraq (UNAMI) – notes that the situation facing civilians in ISIL-controlled territory remains dire with many of those perceived to be opposed to the extremist group’s ideology being murdered, often in “grim public spectacles.”
    Members of ethnic and religious communities, for instance, continue to be persecuted with as many as 3,500 members of the Yezidi community remaining under ISIL captivity enduring physical and sexual violence.
    Others, meanwhile, are apparently being persecuted based on their perceived sexual orientation. On 8 March, the report says, ISIL beheaded two individuals accused of homosexuality and a third for blasphemy in the Bab al-Toob area of Mosul.
    [. . .]
    Although the report widely focuses on the crimes perpetrated by ISIL extremists, it also documents violations committed by the Iraqi Security Forces and affiliated forces, including indiscriminate airstrikes and shelling as well as actions of reprisal against civilians. 



    Meanwhile Margaret Griffis (Antiwar.com) counts 90 violent deaths across Iraq today.




    RECOMMENDED: "Iraq snapshot"
    "Haider eyes Anbar"
    "Hejira"
    "Beauty and the Beast analysis"
    "Hillary applies to serve big business"
    "Mistresses"
    "it really is all about oil"
    "Who will provide cover for the CIA now?"
    "I smell a truest!"
    "The fat lady ain't even humming"
    "The Cranky Reaction"
    "That dreadful Democracy Now"
    "Ruh Row Cranky Clinton"


    "Even her friends can't help her"
    "THIS JUST IN! CRANKY REJECTS INTERVENTION!"