Saturday, September 13, 2014

New York Times has explosive exclusive!

BULLY BOY PRESS & CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL-AID TABLE

IT TOOK A LOT OF HITS AND SLAMS FOR IT'S IRAQ WAR 'REPORTING' FROM 2002 AND 2003 (AND SHOULD HAVE FOR THE 'REPORTING' OF DEXY AND BURNSIE WHICH FOLLOWED) BUT THE GREY LADY IS COMING BACK!

THE NEW YORK TIMES THIS WEEK HAS A WORLD WIDE EXCLUSIVE, A SHATTERING STORY OF DEATH AND A DEATH POSSIBLY CARRIED OUT BY A BELOVED INTERNATIONAL FIGURE.

AS THEIR HEADLINE PROCLAIMS:

"Doctor Who Worked on Joan Rivers Steps Down From Post at Medical Clinic"

DOCTOR WHO!

ONE OF THE MOST BELOVED SCI FI FIGURES OF ALL TIME!

DOCTOR WHO HAS BEEN THE STAR OF A SHOW WHICH HAS PRODUCED NEW EPISODES EVER SINCE 1963.

WILL HIS INVOLVEMENT IN THE DEATH OF COMIC LEGEND JOAN RIVERS BRING DOWN THIS BBC DYNASTY?

STAY TUNED TO THE NEW YORK TIMES FOR MORE GROUND BREAKING REPORTING!

FROM THE TCI WIRE:

The editorial board of the Macon Telegraph weighs in on Iraq -- apparently to demonstrate their brains are as soft as an overripe Georgia peach.

All must come together and support US President Barack Obama's plan, declares a body determined to sport their ignorance.

There is no plan -- just more of the same.

Dissent is the hallmark of democracy.

How sad but telling: Journalists who rush to give up freedom and to censor and bully others.

They grow 'em mighty pathetic at the Telegraph.

Most of all, the scared little puppies can't stop wimpering -- such as here: "We need our lawmakers to act and act quickly. This is a case of national security. We would caution the president about making statements about what we won’t do. As the evolving situation in Syria and Iraq has shown, there may come a time in the not-too-distant future when more American boots are needed on the ground fighting next to Iraqis and Kurds."

You sort of picture them cowering in their own filth, don't you?

What national security?

Do the morons not even know how to listen?

In the speech, Barack declared, "While we have not yet detected specific plotting against our homeland, ISIL leaders have threatened America and our allies."

Where's the threat?

In the horror porn fantasies of those who work for the Telegraph.

Barack's unveiled plan turned out to be the same thing he was already doing but on a little bit wider scope.

And how's that been working out?

One sign of the failure of Barack's action would be membership in the Islamic State increasing.

AP notes CIA spokesperson Ryan Trapani declared today that there had been rapid growth in IS membership since June and that they now have "between 20,000 and 31,500 fighters across Iraq and Syria, up from a previous figure of 10,000."

Not only have Barack's actions not reduced membership in the Islamic State, they also have increased it -- at a rate that not even Nouri managed.

Matthew Rothschild (The Progressive) grasps what the Telegraph's editorial board can't:

Another President who fails to recognize how counterproductive war can be.
In Iraq, there are 6 million Sunnis who, with every bombing against ISIS, will be pushed more and more into the extremists' arms, as they see the United States waging war against fellow Sunnis.
In Syria, 60 percent of the country is Sunni, and bombing ISIS is likely to have a similar effect, further tearing that country apart. And if somehow the bombing "degrades" ISIS, it will serve to solidify Assad in power.

Barack had a chance to offer something new and didn't. What he's planning to do is the same things that have allowed the Islamic State to significantly increase their own membership.

Even Ruth Conniff is dismayed. And I believe she is (I know Matt is).

But over at The Daily Warren -- excuse me, The Nation. It just feels like The Daily Warren.

There's something really sick about a political magazine grabbing onto politicians with all the desperation of a Jimmy Page groupie and running from one celebrity crush to another like a 12-year-old.

If only Elizabeth Warren had a third nipple -- like Harry Styles! -- the staff of The Nation could serenade Warren with "What Makes You Beautiful."

Instead, we're stuck with Leslie Savan and her tired horse face.

Oh, I'm sorry.

Is that the 'optics' Leslie rails against?

Well you know what I don't like?

I don't like the useless -- whether their name is Ralph Nader or Leslie Savin, I don't like 'em.

And you're useless if, like Leslie, you whine that Barack's speech was reduced to 'optics.' No, she doesn't know what she's writing about. Some believe they have an excuse to avoid doing the work.

Which is what she did: avoided doing the work.

First, the press did not dub Barack's suit 'tan.'

The tan suit -- I have no idea if it's tan or not nor did I obsess over it -- check the archives -- came from Twitter and other social media as Barack was delivering his speech.

The press even reported on that.

Leslie missed it.

She misses a great deal. Such as, repeating someone else's criticism -- huge chunks of it -- is not doing any of your own work.

She's so useless that she's written (and copied and pasted) a huge number of words whining about Maureen Dowd and others and how they covered the speech.

What Leslie never did?

Write about the damn speech.

We did. We wrote about it last week when he gave it in the 'tan' suit or whatever.

We wrote about it and we critiqued it.

It's a week later and all useless Leslie and her ugly horseface can do is whinny in the words of others.

Whether you agreed with Maureen Dowd or not, she's always one up on Leslie because Maureen puts her own thoughts in.

Doing a slightly better job than Leslie is Zoe Carpenter who asks "Is the War on ISIS Illegal?"

Zoe never took the time to weigh in herself -- an opinion writer at an opinion journal who can't share her own thoughts?

RECOMMENDED: "Iraq snapshot"
"U.S.-U.K. GENOCIDE AGAINST IRAQ 1990-2012 KILLED 3..."
"Iraq snapshot"
"Iraq snapshot"
"The media exists to sell war"
"Iraq snapshot"
"Is Barack headed for yet another embarrassment?"
"Just another baby killed by Barack in Iraq"
"Barack's now a baby killer in Iraq"
"I Hate The War"
"Time "
"Non posted things"
"Open doors "
just leave me alone"
"The Lamberts"
"Slum lords"
"It's fixed."
"How much money do they need?"
"Tell me the darn price"
"Dee Jays learn the artist"
"TV"
"The attacks on Mindy Kalig"
"joan's send off"
"Lois Lerner belongs in jail"
"Great Tweet"
"A suggested reading or 2"
"Biden's words bite him in the butt"
"Was Denzel being serious?"
"The Spread The Blame Around Coalition"

"Tell it like it is, Mitt, tell it like it is"

"THIS JUST IN! THE AWARD FOR STATING THE OBVIOUS GOES TO . . ."

Sunday, September 07, 2014

Tell it like it is, Mitt, tell it like it is

BULLY BOY PRESS & CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL-AID TABLE

2012 PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEE FOR THE GOP MITT ROMNEY DECLARED TODAY THAT HE WOULD HAVE MADE A BETTER PRESIDENT THAN FADED CELEBRITY BARRY O.

NO S**T, MITT.

YOUR DOG SEAMUS WOULD HAVE MADE A BETTER PRESIDENT -- AND THAT'S BEFORE OR AFTER TRAVELING 12 HOURS ON TOP OF THE CAR.

FROM THE TCI WIRE:

Was John's speech supposed to be homework for Americans or was he attempting to communicate with them?

Does no one know how to communicate in the administration?

It's the show boating, the need to dandy up, that divorces them from the reality so many Americans live in.

So the take away from the above is that, no, US Senator Dianne Feinstein, bombs alone won't change a thing.

They'll change numbers -- they'll increase the numbers of the Islamic State.

John Kerry needs to define what the non-military approach will be.

The American people are left in the dark.

The reason for that is, honestly, the White House still doesn't have a plan.

It doesn't have a plan for war, it doesn't have a plan for diplomacy.

No US troops should have been sent into Iraq in June. Barack certainly shouldn't have announced this week he was sending even more into Iraq. As Kristina Wong (The Hill) reported Tuesday, "President Obama has ordered 405 additional U.S. troops to Iraq on Tuesday, bringing the total of U.S. forces authorized there to more than 1,000, the White House announced Tuesday."

I'm back on Gasoline Alley
Where the smoke looks like a misty valley
And the dotted hills where pills go down the wrong way
In the service of the king and his kingdom too
Oh-oh-oh, oh-oh-oh
I was the man and the woman and the who-knows-who
-- "Down The Wrong Way," written by Chrissie Hynde and Bjorn Yttling, first appears on Chrissie's new album Stockholm.

But if you make the decision to send troops in -- and Barack did make that decision -- then you have already reviewed all options and you should know what you will be doing next.

Otherwise, you're just sending troops in blindly and that's what Barack has done.

And instead of presenting a mission, he's responded to each worsening by tossing more troops onto the fire.

Shame on those -- in Congress, and across the US -- who accept this as a plan.

Kristina Wong (The Hill) reported Friday morning, "Military officials are signaling that the fight against Islamist militants in Iraq could take years, raising the possibility of a new, open-ended military commitment that lasts beyond the Obama presidency. Tony Blinken, the White House’s deputy national security adviser, says defeating the Islamic State of Syria and Iraq (ISIS) would require a long-term commitment."

And that was before John Kerry gave the speech we noted earlier. In it, his final statements include this, "It may take a year, it may take two years, it may take three years."

A planned mission wouldn't be open-ended.

John Kerry grasped that in the Bully Boy Bush years when he was among those insisting there needed to be some form of benchmarks by which to measure whether Iraq was progressing or not. He also once grasped the reality of war. No longer.

RECOMMENDED: "Iraq snapshot"
"Video ~ Peak Inequality, Basic Income & the Emergi..."
"Is it their reward or their punishment?"
"Cindy Sheehan and Michael Parenti"
"Charlie's Angels and Charlie's Angels Full Throttle"
"Mistresses -- oh, that Dr. Karen Kim"
"oh, noam, get real"
"The Campaign Beings In Earnest"
"Extant (Molly's memory)"
"Details emerge on Extant"
"Extant (Ethan's in danger)"
"Mistresses"
"Pretenders"
"Cher and other things"
"If he's lost Kim . . ."
"THIS JUST IN! IT'S ABOUT TO GET 7 STRANGERS 1 HOUSE REAL UP IN HERE!"

Saturday, September 06, 2014

If he's lost Kim . . .

BULLY BOY PRESS & CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL-AID TABLE

FADED CELEBRITY IN CHIEF BARRY O GOT SOME STINGING CRITICISM FROM KIM KARDASHIAN -- AKA THE SWEET ONE.

SHE TOOK HIM TO TASK FOR HIS CRITICISM OF HER AND OF HER HUSBAND AND FOR CALLING HER HUSBAND AN "A**HOLE."

SHE WONDERED WHAT THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES WAS EVEN DOING WEIGHING IN ON POP CULTURE TO BEGIN WITH, IMPLYING THAT HE HAS MUCH MORE IMPORTANT THINGS TO DO.

SILLY KIM, HE REALLY DOESN'T.

THAT'S ABOUT ALL HE CAN HANDLE, CATTY REMARKS ABOUT OTHERS.

FROM THE TCI WIRE:

Russ Wellen, liar or fool?

The Foreign Policy In Focus blogger can never seem to get the facts right.

He's not helped by the fact that he basis his bad article ("Five Ways have aided and abetted the development of the Islamir State'') on Andrew Cockburn's lousy fly-over reporting. But he has only himself to blame for this nonsense:

The general state of chaos in which the United States left Iraq with, to this day, no strong central government.

How stupid does he have to be to write that? Or is he just a lousy liar?

Those of us who actually paid attention to the issue of Iraq over the last years know damn well that Nouri implemented a power grab and did so with no objection from FPIF which had no time for Iraq. And now it wants to play catch up and, lazy student, uses Andrew Cockburn's (bad and biased) reporting to play catch up.

Is it any wonder that Wellen and Foreign Policy In Focus are fumbling in the dark?

Nouri's corruption did not begin in his second term.

Congress heard repeatedly about his corruption.

In fact, Barack heard repeatedly --

Oh, wait, he didn't.

Had he attended Committee hearings in 2007 and 2008, he would have heard about Nouri's corruption but, of course, he was too busy for hearings, rushing in only when the cameras were present.

His desire to take over the central bank and the courts were already well known.

But when he made those efforts in his second term, FPIF didn't say one damn word. If Russ missed these events, he'll never find them in Patrick Cockburn's writings filled with lust for thug Nouri.

Lust for war is something FPIF would rail against if it had any guts.

It has no guts and no spine.

Strolling through the western press on Iraq today is very depressing.

Iraqis still don't matter.

The Islamic State, we are told, are 'barbaric,' vile and many other things.

And the proof?

One American journalist and one American and Israeli journalist were killed.

Their deaths are unfortunate.

But this is the basis for worst terrorists ever?

In fairness to the press, the White House -- both US President Barack Obama and US Vice President Joe Biden -- repeat similar statements near constantly -- that these deaths will be avenged and blah, blah, blah.

Not only does this nonsense erase Iraqis and their suffering from the public history, it also shows an extreme ignorance of history -- from early US history all the way up to at least the Symbionese Liberation Army.

The deaths are regrettable but they're justification for massive military maneuvers?

It's like a retelling of Helen of Troy done in a house of mirrors.

RECOMMENDED: "Iraq snapshot"
"If the White House is done blustering . "
"War Crimes?"
"Bruce Springsteen"
"Barack's expansion"
"the queen is dead"
"Too soon"
"Joan Rivers"
"A legend passed"
"Can we talk?"
"The family speaks"
"THIS JUST IN! FROM HIS OWN BROTHER!"

Thursday, September 04, 2014

The family speaks

BULLY BOY PRESS & CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL-AID TABLE

THEY SAY YOUR FAMILY KNOWS YOU BEST.

FADED CELEBRITY BARRY O BETTER HOPE NOT.

HIS HALF-BROTHER'S PUBLISHING A BOOK CALLING BARRY O "A STUCK UP A**HOLE."

FROM THE TCI WIRE:

We've heard of an embarrassment of riches, right? Today, it's just a wealth of embarrassments as far as the eye can see.

Take US Vice President Joe Biden. I know Joe. I like Joe -- hell, I love Joe.

But come on.

David Sharp (AP) quotes Joe declaring today that "they [the Islamic State] should know we will follow them to the gates of hell until they are brought to justice. Because hell is where they'll reside."

Now look, if Joe wants to visit Dick and Lynne Cheney, that's his business and right, but leave out all this "we" stuff because the bulk of us have no desire to go to hell and visit the Cheneys.

On a more serious note, it has to be asked, "At the gates of hell, what will you be doing, Joe?"

Lawyering up?

I ask because you could have served in Vietnam. Unlike many women and men (including me), you didn't oppose the war so, being a man, you could have served in combat.

You didn't.

You weren't even a photographer like Al Gore.

So at the gates of hell, what exactly are you able to do?

For your own safety, Joe, you need to ask that question.

For others also.

Always a lot of male bragging, very little actual male bravery.

Take "Ali." He's an Iraqi soldier -- one Human Rights Watch trusted.

I wouldn't trust him.

His unit made the mistake of trusting him, he's alive and they're dead.

Heather Saul (Belfast Telegraph) explains Ali claims he survived the executions most Iraqi soldiers he was with experienced.

He crawled away wounded?

No, he played dead.

Let's get bravery clear, a young girl, Anne Frank, living in hiding is brave. Anne had no gun, Anne had no combat training, she was not part of a military unit.

You may call someone with a gun and training who refuses to use both to take out the enemy or attempt to save those he or she was serving with "lucky" (you might not) but most people wouldn't repeat the story.

Most people would realize they look a little weak and cowardly.

I don't believe in war and if Ali put down his gun in protest of death and destruction, I'd be the first to applaud him for that.

But that didn't happen, did it?

Ali was and remains pro-war. He's willing for the fighting to continue.

But, as we've now learned, when push comes to shove, he'll pretend to be dead while his unit is shot and killed. He'll save his own life by refusing to risk it to help out his comrades.

I don't know why you'd trust a word out of the mouth of Ali.

Again, give me a Kyle Snyder, a Joshua Key, someone who is opposed to the war and I'll back them and applaud them. But give me a pro-war man or woman who, in combat, refuses to defend his or her fellow soldiers?

That's a coward.

And it's a shame his unit didn't know that going into the battle against the Islamic State.

RECOMMENDED: "Iraq snapshot"
"The (successful) Intimidation of Barack"
"A War Hawk flutters"
"Can we believe them?"
"Crazy Joe"
"To be Movieline, Guess Who Don't Sue"
"Barack's not all that speech"
"That lying media"
"update on joan rivers"
"I pissed off a friend today . . ."
"1225"
"Look how they lie"
"Even Time turns on him"
"THIS JUST IN! GRASPING AT STRAWS!"

Wednesday, September 03, 2014

Even Time turns on him

BULLY BOY PRESS & CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL-AID TABLE

POOR FADED CELEBRITY IN CHIEF BARRY O, EVEN TIME IS PANNING HIS LATEST SPEECH:

The rhetoric hit its marks. The message, however, was muddled.
As he finished his speaking engagements, several questions remained about how he intends to deal with the multiple foreign policy crises facing his administration.

REACHED FOR COMMENT, BARRY O SPUTTERED TO THESE REPORTERS, "B-B-B-UT THE RHETORIC, THEY LOVED THE RHETORIC AT LEAST!"

FROM THE TCI WIRE:

Barack will do whatever he wants to do.

A large number of Americans favor single-payer, universal health care similar to what they have in Canada and other countries dubbed "first world countries." (Iraq has this sort of health care, by the way.) But that didn't force Barack into pushing that through Congress. No, Americans were made prisoners of insurance companies -- sheer coincidence, you understand, that the insurance lobby had been big donors to his 2008 campaign.

Time and again, Barack does what he wants -- which is generally move further to the right.

So stop typing up your sexual fantasies of the maiden Barack spirited out the window of his bedroom, tossed over the shoulder of some kissy-faced brute.

They're insulting.

Barack does what he wants to do.

TE and others repeatedly offer excuses not to be mad at Barack. A flat out lie becomes "a lame cover story" and Barack's actions of war are things he really, cross TE's heart, didn't want to do. So don't feel outrage, don't wonder if you should be in the streets.

Barack is really, really like torn and stuff, he's like really, really not wanting to do this. So, you feel me, cut him some slack. Being president is like a really tough job and stuff.

Digging ditches is a tough job. Scrubbing toilets is a tough job. Raising kids is a tough job.

Giving four years of your life so you get pension and health care and you and your family get bodyguards for life? So your wife gets her own pension because you were president?

These and so many other perks don't go to ditch diggers. Or maids. Or stay-at-home parents, day care workers, nannies, etc.

In addition to the fact that the job should be one of the greatest professional honors any American citizen could have.

So let's all stop supplicating and whining about 'poor Barack.'

He does what he wants to do.

So today what he wants to do is send more US troops into Iraq.

White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest issued the following statement tonight:

Today, the President authorized the Department of Defense to fulfill a Department of State request for approximately 350 additional U.S. military personnel to protect our diplomatic facilities and personnel in Baghdad, Iraq. This action was taken at the recommendation of the Department of Defense after an extensive interagency review, and is part of the President’s commitment to protect our personnel and facilities in Iraq as we continue to support the Government of Iraq in its fight against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL). These additional forces will not serve in a combat role.
The President has made clear his commitment to doing whatever is required to provide the necessary security for U.S. personnel and facilities around the world. The request he approved today will allow some previously deployed military personnel to depart Iraq, while at the same time providing a more robust, sustainable security force for our personnel and facilities in Baghdad.
In addition to our efforts to protect our personnel, we will continue to support the Government of Iraq’s efforts to counter ISIL, which poses a threat not only to Iraq, but to the broader Middle East and U.S. personnel and interests in the region. The President will be consulting this week with NATO allies regarding additional actions to take against ISIL and to develop a broad-based international coalition to implement a comprehensive strategy to protect our people and to support our partners in the fight against ISIL. As part of this effort, Secretary Kerry, Secretary Hagel, and President Obama’s counterterrorism advisor, Lisa Monaco, will be traveling separately to the region in the near-term to build a stronger regional partnership.

Chelsea J. Carter and Jomana Karadsheh (CNN) report, "The new troops will bring the number of American troops in Iraq to well over 1,000, with most serving either as diplomatic security or military advisers to Iraq's security forces." Jamie Dupree (WSB Radio, Cox Media Group) adds, "The extra 350 military personnel would bring the total of American servicemembers in Iraq to around 1,300, acting in roles as military advisers or for protection of U.S. diplomats inside Iraq." Spencer Ackerman (Guardian) offers, "Intentionally or not, Obama has effectively responded to Isis by signaling an intensification of the latest US war in Iraq. Obama has now launched 124 airstrikes against Isis since 8 August, while swearing not to introduce 'combat boots on the ground'."

"Misty"
"THIS JUST IN! CALL HIM MISTY!"

Sunday, August 31, 2014

Misty

BULLY BOY PRESS & CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL-AID TABLE

WHAT'S CONSIDERED TIMID AND SKITTISH?

NO, NOT A KITTEN.

FADED CELEBRITY BARRY O.

HE'S LIKE A KITTEN UP A TREE.

FROM THE TCI WIRE:

We'll start with this Tweet.

US Mission to NATO @USNATO · 8h

Iraq -- US F-18 fighter jet refuels from a U.S. Air Force KC-135 Stratotanker aircraft over northern Iraq

US Mission to NATO @USNATO · 8h

View more photos and videos

Thursday, the State Dept's Brett McGurk Tweeted, "Today in #Iraq, US air strikes against #ISIS terrorists destroyed four armed vehicles, a humvee, tank, construction vehicle, & checkpoint." AP notes this was the 106th US bombing in Iraq since August 8th.

Cedric and Wally emphasized the financial cost on Friday noting that a cost of $7.5 million a day means at least $555 million through Friday which would be over a half-billion dollars.

That's not coming out of US President Barack Obama's pocket, the US tax payer is footing the bill.

It's a bill that continues to grow.

The US taxpayer didn't authorize the bill and certainly wasn't consulted about putting more money on the tab.
They're not even informed what the plan is because there is no plan. Karen DeYoung (Washington Post) reports:

Amid conflicting congressional demands, impatient Arab allies, and public concern that he will do too much or too little, President Obama made bluntly clear Thursday why he has not yet implemented a comprehensive U.S. response to the Islamist insurgency that is rapidly spreading across the Middle East.
“We don’t have a strategy yet,” Obama said, in response to questions about when he is prepared to begin military action in Syria, and, if not, why not?

White House spokesperson Josh Earnest has made the media rounds insisting that Iraq is not without a strategy, just Syria.

That's spin, not truth.

The White House continues to link Syria and Iraq so, if they have no plan for Syria, then they have no plan for Iraq.

The White House presents the Islamic State as darting back and forth between Syria and Iraq -- which share a border -- and doing damage in both countries as part of a larger, coherent plan to implement a fundamentalist state.

Is that correct?

Who knows. They've never backed it up.

Asked why what is taking place is taking place, from the State Dept to the White House, they can't provide concrete answers. They can talk 'barbaric' and other rhetoric. They can assert that the entire Middle East is at risk and, more recently, that the US mainland is at risk.

It's a cute little fear fantasy.

It dissolves a bit if you apply common sense to it.

Syria and Iraq share a border.

Syria also shares a border with Turkey.

Is the Islamic State somehow intimidated by Turkey?

Or by Israel or Jordan?

Syria borders Iraq, Turkey, Israel and Jordan.

And just off the coast of Syria, to its west, you have the Republic of Cyprus.

If you were a terrorist group intent on taking territory -- which really seems more like the goal of a group of invaders (and historically we've not referred to such groups as terrorists) -- wouldn't Cyprus be your first target?

It's small. It's an island -- meaning you could monitor incoming and outgoing traffic much easier than with landlocked countries.

It's a bit of a resort island which, for most people, would say 'soft target' -- especially when contrasted with a large country.

Syria's not responsible for Iraq but the US government has wanted war with the Syrian government for some time. They wanted it under Bully Boy Bush -- remember the diplomatic tiffs -- and they want it under Barack.

A connection that Syria and Iraq do have -- that can be established factually -- is that Sunnis and Shi'ites are going into both countries to fight. In both countries -- and this is what has given IS its power -- Sunnis feel persecuted.

You can argue whether they are or not.

That's really pointless.

The perception is they are being persecuted.

That perception is strong and growing.

RECOMMENDED: "Talking entry"
"Remarks by the President to the American Legion Na..."
"Iraq snapshot"
"Barack on Iraq"
"Barack re-writes rules of war"
"Mahdi"
"Extant (what's going on)"
"joan"
"Extant (Ethan)"
"Barack has no skill set"
"Considering the legality"
"Captain America and Joan Rivers"
"Prince"
"Extant"
"Eugene Robinson finds his voice"
"And we thought the suit was bad"
"THIS JUST IN! THE SUIT WASN'T THE ONLY DISASTER!"

Friday, August 29, 2014

And we thought the suit was bad

BULLY BOY PRESS & CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL-AID TABLE

THURSDAY, FADED CELEBRITY BARRY O DECLARED THAT THE U.S. GOVERNMENT HAD NO PLAN FOR IRAQ OR SYRIA YET.

THE GUARDIAN INFORMS THAT IT'S COST THE U.S. TAXPAYER $7.5 A DAY FOR BARRY O'S IRAQ ADVENTURES SINCE JUNE 16TH.

THAT ADDS UP TO OVER A 1/2 BILLION DOLLARS SO FAR ($555 MILLION, TO BE PRECISE).

NO RUSH ON DECIDING ANY TIME SOON, BARRY O, BUT REMEMBER, TIP IS 15% MINIMUM.

FROM THE TCI WIRE:

Today on a KPFA newsbreak, Mark Mericle noted:

Oakland Congresswoman Barbara Lee is one of three lawmakers who have sent a letter to Republican House Speaker John Boehner calling for a debate and a vote on an authorization for the use of military force in Iraq when the House of Representatives returns on September 8th. In a statement, Lee says that it's clear that the current US mission in Iraq is extended beyond the limited, specific and targeted scope of preventing genocide and ensuring the security of US personnel there. Lee said the president must seek Congressional authorization before the situation escalates further. She was joined by Democrat Jim McGovern and Republican Walter Jones. The three were the principle co-sponsers of a resolution that overwhelming passed the House with 370 votes. It said the president should not deploy or maintain United States armed forces in a sustained combat role in Iraq without the specific authorization from Congress.

Time's Jay Newton-Small explains:

There are some in Congress who are calling on Obama to push through a War Powers Resolution. Article II of the Constitution grants the President the power to defend the country. But Article I gives only Congress the power to declare war. So, what in a post-war-on-terrorism era constitutes an actual war? In 1973, afraid of Vietnam mission creep, Congress passed the War Powers Act, which requires the President to consult Congress 60 days after engaging in hostilities. If you count bombing a foreign country as hostile — as the U.S. did against militants in northern Iraq on Aug. 7 — then the 60 days expires Oct. 7.
Theoretically, if Congress cares about not further weakening its oversight of the President’s ability to bomb whatever country he pleases, lawmakers will move to pass a War Powers Resolution in the next month. Presidents, including Obama, have argued that the War Powers Act is unconstitutional. But a turf fight over who gets to go to war is the last thing on Congress’ mind weeks before the midterm elections.

Meanwhile, US President Barack Obama insisted today that "throughout this process, we've consulted closely with Congress, and the feedback I've gotten from Congress is, is that we're doing the right thing."

He was speaking this afternoon at the White House -- in the suit that gave Cedric and Wally pause.

US President Barack Obama: Second, in Iraq, our dedicated pilots and crews continue to carry out the targeted strikes that I authorized to protect Americans there and to address the humanitarian situation on the ground. As Commander-in-Chief, I will always do what is necessary to protect the American people and defend against evolving threats to our homeland. Because of our strikes, the terrorists of ISIL are losing arms and equipment. In some areas, Iraqi government and Kurdish forces have begun to push them back. And we continue to be proud and grateful to our extraordinary personnel serving in this mission. Now, ISIL poses an immediate threat to the people of Iraq and to people throughout the region. And that’s why our military action in Iraq has to be part of a broader, comprehensive strategy to protect our people and to support our partners who are taking the fight to ISIL. And that starts with Iraq’s leaders building on the progress that they've made so far and forming an inclusive government that will unite their country and strengthen their security forces to confront ISIL. Any successful strategy, though, also needs strong regional partners. I'm encouraged so far that countries in the region -- countries that don't always agree on many things -- increasingly recognize the primacy of the threat that ISIL poses to all of them. And I've asked Secretary Kerry to travel to the region to continue to build the coalition that’s needed to meet this threat. As I've said, rooting out a cancer like ISIL will not be quick or easy, but I'm confident that we can -- and we will -- working closely with our allies and our partners. For our part, I've directed Secretary Hagel and our Joint Chiefs of Staff to prepare a range of options. I'll be meeting with my National Security Council again this evening as we continue to develop that strategy. And I've been consulting with members of Congress and I’ll continue to do so in the days ahead.

Barack was several minutes late for the appearance which is strange until you realize he was supposed to begin speaking at four but had been scheduled to meet, also at four, with US Vice President Joe Biden and the National Security Council. Barack is said to have met for four minutes ahead of the meeting. A quick four minutes. And, as he noted in his remarks, he was meeting with them later that evening as well.

"Them" was identified in this White House press release:

Readout of the President’s Meeting with the National Security Council on Iraq and ISIL

This afternoon the President met with his National Security Council to discuss the situation in Iraq, our ongoing efforts to support the Iraqi government, and our comprehensive strategy to counter the threat posed by ISIL in Iraq and Syria. The President will continue to consult with his national security team in the days to come.
Participants in today’s meeting included:
The Vice President (via secure video)
Secretary of State John Kerry (via secure video)
Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel (via secure video)
Attorney General Eric Holder
Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson (via secure video)
White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough
National Security Advisor Susan Rice
U.S. Permanent Representative to the United Nations Samantha Power (via secure video)
White House Counsel Neil Eggleston
Director of National Intelligence James Clapper
Director of the Central Intelligence Agency John Brennan
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Martin Dempsey (via secure video)
Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff James Winnefeld
Director of the National Counterterrorism Center Matthew Olsen
U.S. Central Command Commander Lloyd Austin (via secure video)
Director of the Office of Management and Budget Shaun Donovan
Deputy National Security Advisor Antony Blinken
Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism Lisa Monaco
Deputy National Security Advisor for International Economics Caroline Atkinson
Deputy Secretary of State William Burns
White House Coordinator for the Middle East, North Africa, and Gulf Region Philip Gordon
Assistant to the President and Director of the Office of Legislative Affairs Katie Fallon
Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Iraq and Iran Brett McGurk
U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Robert Stephen Beecroft (via secure video)

Suzanne George, Executive Secretary and Chief of Staff of the National Security Council

In an embarrassing article for the Guardian (Barack is seen as torn -- deer in the headlights, little puppy, etc.), Spencer Ackerman does note, "Obama’s national security team convened at the White House Thursday afternoon to discuss the contours of a still-inchoate strategy. Administration officials have recently begun describing Isis in apocalyptic and near-hysterical terms, even as they decline to endorse additional military action against it, a discrepancy that has prompted confusion in Washington and beyond."

Maybe these sketchy meetings explain in part why the 'mission' in Iraq still lacks a mission?

Josh Jordan Tweeted the following today:

Francis Matthew (Gulf News) notes:

This alarming lack of purpose is reflected in how the world’s superpower is confused about what it is trying to do. President Barack Obama has offered some deeply contradictory messages as he first authorised humanitarian support on a strictly limited basis, but then talked of refusing to allow Isil to continue and the necessity of a long drawn-out struggle.

It is clear that the growing acceptance of the importance of defeating Isil is creating some very uneasy alliances, as the Iranians and Bashar Al Assad regime in Syria offer to work with the Americans and Saudis. This fits into the new pragmatic search for stability that will dominate the Arab world for the next few years, as regional and world powers work with any non-Islamist who can regain control of a nation state and impose an end to civil war and chaos.

Here are some Tweets in reaction to Barack's speech:

Thursday, August 28, 2014

He's looking bad, real bad

BULLY BOY PRESS & CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL-AID TABLE

FADED CELEBRITY IN CHIEF BARRY O IS SPEAKING FROM THE WHITE HOUSE IN THE MOST AWFUL SUIT A PRESIDENT HAS EVER WORE.

THE SHOULDERS SWALLOW HIM AND THE FACT THAT IT LOOKS LIKE AN OLD MAN'S SUIT DOESN'T HELP.

CHUCK TODD IS ATTEMPTING TO DISTRACT FROM THE SUIT THE SAME WAY HE ATTEMPTS TO DISTRACT FROM HIS OWN BALD SPOT.

BUT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE NOW KNOW, BARRY O DIGS THROUGH THE CLOSET OF ANY SUPPORTING MALE CHARACTER IN A TENNESSEE WILLIAMS PLAY.

BUT WOULD A SUPPORTING CHARACTER WEAR THAT MUCH MAKE UP?

THEY'VE PILED SO MUCH ON BARRY O THAT HIS BLACK MOLES LOOK PINK!

FROM THE TCI WIRE:

Tonight the Washington Post published a column by Anbar Province Governor Ahmed Khalaf al-Dulaimi which notes:

We are struggling in this war against the forces of darkness, but we are a people who can see the light at the end of the tunnel, even if it is thousands of miles away. No matter how dim the light, we hope that it will shine brighter every day.

Iraqis have the right to live in peace. Our young people have the right to enjoy all the wonderful things that life has to offer. And we have a responsibility to give them hope that will empower them to live life to the fullest, to reach out to their counterparts in other nations and to turn away from death and extremism.

The Iraqi people are a strong group who has overcome repeatedly the attacks and 'help' from outsiders. And, of course, they managed to survive two terms under the despot and tyrant Nouri al-Maliki.

We frequently note he's not gone here and sometimes add that Nouri will only be truly gone when he's in the ground.

Some e-mails insist that's too harsh. Nouri's shown a kinder side in recent days and weeks, one e-mailer argued.

Has he? Well that certainly erases his sending his goons into middle schools and high schools to liken gay men to vampires and to encourage the students to bully, harm and kill and Iraqi gays they might know. Right? And doesn't it wipe away all the Sunni protesters he killed?

And doesn't it just vanish all the civilians in Falluja he's killed and wounded with his bombing of residential -neighborhoods? (National Iraq News Agency notes the bombing of Falluja's residential neighborhoods today left 3 civilians dead and seven more injured.)

And we could go on and on.

Nouri's a thug.

I'm not kind to thugs, so sorry.

And my belief that Nouri's not gone yet -- even though the world press tells us he is outgoing -- gone, gone, gone?

Hamza Mustafa (Asharq Al-Awsat) reports:

Iraq’s outgoing Prime Minister Nuri Al-Maliki said on Wednesday he was prepared to form a new government from among Iraq’s Shi’ite parties if ongoing talks on the shape of the new government fail.
Speaking in his weekly national address, Maliki claimed that the Shi’ite-led National Alliance—which includes his State of Law coalition, parties loyal to firebrand cleric Moqtada Al-Sadr, and the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq (ISCI)—had a “Plan B” in place if Prime Minister-designate Haider Al-Abadi was unable to make progress in talks on forming a government with Sunni and Kurdish factions.

Still think Nouri's packed it in? Or, and this is a better guess, are you thinking Nouri's actively working to ensure that Prime Minister-designate Haider al-Abadi fails so that he can be named to the position and take 30 days to form a government?

RECOMMENDED: "Iraq snapshot"
"Iraq: Hope you loved those 2002 fashions"
" No more war on Iraq"
"A good question re: Iraq"
"Iraq and the selling of fear"
"Oprah, who knew?"
"It's all in for more Iraq War"
"So that's what it takes to get crap cancelled"
"i'm so tired of the heat"
"Sady Doyle, get an education"
"No one learns anything"
"Ray McGovern's sexual fantasies about Barack"
"He just wanted a little hey-hey-hey"
"THIS JUST IN! THEY TRICKED HIM AGAIN!"

Cedric's Big Mix

Saturday, September 13, 2014

New York Times has explosive exclusive!

Sunday, September 07, 2014

Tell it like it is, Mitt, tell it like it is

Saturday, September 06, 2014

If he's lost Kim . . .

Thursday, September 04, 2014

The family speaks

Wednesday, September 03, 2014

Even Time turns on him

Sunday, August 31, 2014

Misty

Friday, August 29, 2014

And we thought the suit was bad

Readout of the President’s Meeting with the National Security Council on Iraq and ISIL

Thursday, August 28, 2014

He's looking bad, real bad

About Me

Links

Cedric's Big Mix