Thursday, November 03, 2016

Barack clams up regarding Justice Dept. mole

BULLY BOY PRESS &   CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL AID TABLE

WITH THE WIKILEAKS NEWS THAT AN F.B.I. MOLE WAS FEEDING CRANKY CLINTON'S CAMPAIGN, FADED CELEBRITY BARRY O CLAMMED UP TIGHTER THAN A DENTAL CONDOM.

WHEN THESE REPORTERS REACHED THE PAMPERED PRINCESS, HE WAS GETTING "A VENEZUELIAN" -- HE EXPLAINED IT'S WHERE THEY WAX YOU FROM THE NAVAL TO BEHIND THE TAINT -- AND SIPPING ON AN ORANGE DREAMSICLE.


IN BETWEEN SHOUTING FROM PAIN AND PRACTIING HIS POUT, BARRY O EXPLAINED THAT IS HIS JOB TO COMMENT ON ALL ONGOING  F.B.I. INVESTIGATIONS, "UNLESS THEY REFLECT POORLY ON ME.  AND THIS WHOLE CLINTON MOLE IN THE FBI REFLECTS POORLY ON ME.  I KNOW BECAUSE VALERIE JARRETT TOLD ME, 'BARRY O, THIS REFLECTS POORLY ON YOU.'  SO I WAS ALL, 'LIKE WHAT DO I DO NOW?  GET THE SELFIE STICK?  STAGE ANOTHER NIP SLIP?  INSTAGRAM RACY PHOTOS OF ME AND BO?'  AND VALERIE WAS ALL LIKE 'YOU JUST GO HAVE YOURSELF A SPA DAY.'  IF THAT'S WHAT THE COUNTRY NEEDS ME TO DO, THEN SO BE IT."


FROM THE TCI WIRE:


"Bill Clinton is a rapist!"

The cry was heard yesterday.

It stems from Juanita Broaddrick's charge that Bill raped her in 1978.  She came forward publicly in 1999.  She was one of at least three women that Congress was informed of during the impeachment of Bill Clinton by the House and the censure of him by the Senate.

And let's be clear, he wasn't impeached for "sex" or for "lying about sex."

He lied under oath, denying his affair with Monica Lewinsky.  But he also was impeached for obstructing justice.  This had to do with attorney Bill -- who knew the law -- trying to coach Betty Currie into lying for him under oath.

It wasn't just him lying, grasp that, he tried to get his White House assistant to lie for him.

After the impeachment and censure had taken place, NBC NEWS finally aired the interview with Broaddrick that they had been sitting on.

In 1999, Juanita Broaddrick publicly charged Bill Clinton had raped her.

He has never commented.

He has never been asked about it.

The issue flared up again when Hillary Clinton, War Hawk and fake feminist, declared that all victims should be believed.

"I want to send a message to every survivor of sexual assault: Don't let anyone silence your voice. You have the right to be heard.
Hillary, September 14, 2015


This led to a rally where she was confronted with the question of what about Juanita Broaddrick, Paula Jones (whom Bill Clinton payed nearly a million dollars to end her lawsuit against him for harassment) and the other women.

Hillary snarled that the person was rude and refused to answer the question.

Like her husband, Hillary's never publicly commented.

It's strange that a man would be accused of rape and refuse to answer the charge for nearly two decades.

It's equally strange that his wife would do the same.

Yesterday, Hillary hit the party town of Fort Lauderdale in Florida and it's there that the cry of "Bill Clinton is a rapist!" was heard again.


David Gardner (EVENING STANDARD) reports Hillary responded with "a tirade."  Lucy Clarke-Billings (NEWSWEEK) adds:


Clinton's voice became hoarse as she yelled: “I am sick and tired of the negative, dark, divisive, dangerous vision and the anger of people who support Donald Trump.
“It is time for us to say no, we are not going backwards, we’re going forward into a brighter future.”


Samantha Chang (BPR) observes, "Hillary can dish it out but she sure can't take it."  NBC NEWS notes that Hillary "unloaded" on the protester -- but they -- and so many other -- fail to mention Juanita Broaddrick.

How is that reporting?

It's not.

But notice that Hillary didn't deny the charge.

She's screaming her head off, in the middle of her 20 minute speech that she shortens to get the hell out of there, but she never says what most wives would in a similar situation, "My husband is not a rapist."

Is there a reason she can't say those words?


Meanwhile, campaigning in Immokalee, Florida, yesterday, Bill heard the same shouted charge.  Adam Pinsker (FOX 4) reports:

"Bill Clinton is a rapist!," was yelled before he was escorted away.
Clinton seemed unfazed by the interruption.
"They sometimes lose their way, they start calling us names that better apply to their candidate and their campaign" said Clinton, referring to GOP nominee Donald Trump.


Bill doesn't answer the charge either.

He's standing in public, speaking to a small crowd, and he's called a rapist for his actions with Juanita Broaddrick and he doesn't respond to that?

How hard is it for him to say, "I did not rape that woman"?


We know he can say, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman."

He had a two year affair with Monica Lewinsky and yet went on national television to declare, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman."

There he was just accused of a consensual affair.

And yet he felt the need to respond (to lie).

But he was accused of rape in 1999 and he's never spoken to that charge.

Nor has his wife.

And it's not an issue that's going to go away.

And let's repeat that Congress learned of Broaddrick's allegation at the same time they learned of two other women saying he'd raped them.

Did Bill Clinton rape Juanita Broaddrick?

I hope not.

But the charge is out there and he has refused to answer it.

(Hiding behind David E. Kendall is an act of weasel words even for Bill who knows all about weasel words and hair splitting over what the definition of "is" is.)

Hillary snarled Saturday, "Voters deserve to get full and complete facts."

If Michael Dukakis' wife Kitty had to be examined by the press, so should Bill and the country has a right to know if he's a rapist.

Sorry, being a rapist does not qualify as "a privacy issue."

Voters deserve to know.

All the more true when Hillary's tried to build a campaign on allegations about Donald Trump's actions with women.

Rape is not a minor charge.

A woman accused Bill Clinton of rape.

That's one of the most serious charges that can be made.

It damn well deserves an answer.

And calling a woman's assertion that she was raped "divisive"?

Hillary is disgusting.

And grasp for a moment: In 1992, accused of infidelity, Bill Clinton went on 60 MINUTES to deny the rumors.  Today, accused of rape, neither he nor Hillary will say it did not happen.


RECOMMENDED: "Clinton's campaign chair John Podesta's brother To..."
"BREAKING: Department of Justice Tipped Off Hillary..."
"DoJ gave Hillary Clinton secret "heads up" about e..."
"Iraq snapshot"
"If the Clinton machine weren't above the law Super..."
"Iraq snapshot"
"Iraq snapshot"
"Isaiah's THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS "Hillary Talks ..."
"Talk about War Crimes in Iraq and Twitter will sil..."
"Kat's Korner: Chris Brown's all mixed up on his mi..."
"Isaiah's THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS "Hillary and th..."
"Why can't Hillary or Bill deny the rape charge against Bill? "
"Smart people are voting for Jill"
"hillary's a crook"
"He wants to be her White House intern"
"Our bitch Barack"
"Oh, Donna Brazile, pack it in already"
"And grasp for a moment: In 1992, accused of infidelity, Bill Clinton went on 60 MINUTES to deny the rumors.  Today, accused of rape, neither he nor Hillary will say it did not happen."
"THE YOUNG TURKS are on fire!!!!"
"Department of Justice employee leaked investigation to Clinton campaign"
"The Young Turks, Glen Ford"
"I'm standing with Jill"
"Hillary and her band of thieves"
"Corrupt"
"Jill cares"
"Calling all Bernie supporters"
"When will this election be over?"
"You have to wonder"
"baby franco and the beauty queen"
"Hillary and her mafia"
"Enthusiasm for Hillary continues to underwhelm"
"James Bond"
"She needs to resign"
"She has no shame"
"More lies from Paul Krugman"
"Hillary and her excuses"
"Typical Hill"
"they had to feed her questions"
"Hillary and the FBI"
"Now she's frying in grease"
"Hillary's chickens come home to roost"
""Not Born In A Manger"
"Cranky Clinton is out for the kill"
"THIS JUST IN! SHE EATS SMALL TODDLERS!"

Saturday, October 29, 2016

Cranky Clinton is out for the kill

BULLY BOY PRESS &   CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL AID TABLE


THAT CRAZY CRANKY CLINTON IS UNDER CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION BY THE F.B.I. YET AGAIN.

REACHED FOR COMMENT, CRANKY STOPPED CHEWING OFF THE HEAD OF A SMALL TODDLER LONG ENOUGH TO SNARL, "IT DON'T MEAN S**T! NO ONE CAN STOP ME! DID YOU NOT SEE MY LATEST TWEET?"

THESE REPORTERS DID SEE IT.


“The Director owes it to the American people to immediately provide the full details of what he is now examining.”



WHEN THESE REPORTERS ASKED WHAT CRANKY HERSELF OWED THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, LIKE THE TRANSCRIPTS TO HER WALL STREET SPEECHES, SHE LUNGED AT THESE REPORTERS WITH HER FANGS BARED BUT TRIPPED OVER HER OWN IMMENSE BELLY FAT AND FELL TO THE GROUND.

AT WHICH POINT, THESE REPORTERS HIGHTAILED IT OUT OF THERE.





Saif Hameed and Maher Chmaytelli (REUTERS) report, "Iraqi Shi'ite militias said on Friday they would launch an offensive against Islamic State west of Mosul imminently, a move which would block any retreat by the Sunni jihadists into Syria but is likely to alarm Iraq's northern neighbor Turkey."

This may or may not alarm Turkey.

Of greater concern should be the issue of the region which is not going to see these militias as 'helpers' or 'liberators' but as attackers and threats to their well being.


Then there's the US government.

Their bombings are not to be directed by these militias, they are not to support these militias.

These militias are accused of War Crimes.

There's also the concern that Hayder al-Abadi, prime minister of Iraq, has stated that these militias will not take part.


Is there any consistent in any of this?

Apparently not.


On that topic, Stephen Gowans (GLOBAL RESEARCH) explores the differences between the US government's views and actions in Iraq versus in Syria:

To recover Ramadi from Islamic State, Iraqi forces surrounded and cordoned off the city. [6] In addition, the US led coalition bombarded Ramadi with airstrikes and artillery fire. [7] The bombardment left 70 percent of Ramadi’s buildings in ruins. The city was recovered, but “the great majority of its 400,000 people” were left homeless. [8]
Iraqi forces also besieged the city of Fallujah, preventing most food, medicine and fuel from entering it. [9] Militias “prevented civilians from leaving Islamic State territory while resisting calls to allow humanitarian aid to reach the city.” [10] This was done “to strangle Islamic State” [11] with the result that civilians were also “strangled.” Inside the city, tens of thousands endured famine and sickness due to lack of medicine. [12] Civilians reportedly survived on grass and plants. [13] Many civilians “died under buildings that collapsed under” artillery bombardment and coalition air strikes. [14]

The current campaign to recover Mosul is based on the same siege strategy US forces and their Iraqi client used to liberate Ramadi and Fallujah. US and allied warplanes have been bombarding the city for months. [15] Iraqi forces, aided by US Special Forces, are moving to cordon it off. “Some aid groups estimate that as many as a million people could be displaced by fighting to recapture the city, creating a daunting humanitarian task that the United Nations and other organizations say they are not yet ready to deal with.” [16]
Writer and journalist Jonathan Cook commented on the utter hypocrisy of Westerners who condemn the Syrian/Russian campaign to liberate East Aleppo from Islamist fighters while celebrating the Iraqi/US campaign to do the same in Mosul. Targeting the British newspaper, the Guardian, beloved by progressives, Cook contrasted two reports which appeared in the newspaper to illustrate the Western heart beating for all except those the US Empire drowns in blood.
Report one: The Guardian provides supportive coverage of the beginning of a full-throttle assault by Iraqi forces, backed by the US and UK, on Mosul to win it back from the jihadists of ISIS – an assault that will inevitably lead to massive casualties and humanitarian suffering among the civilian population.
Report two: The Guardian provides supportive coverage of the US and UK for considering increased sanctions against Syria and Russia. On what grounds? Because Syrian forces, backed by Russia, have been waging a full-throttle assault on Aleppo to win it back from the jihadists of ISIS and Al-Qaeda – an assault that has led to massive casualties and humanitarian suffering among the civilian population. [17]

Central to Western propaganda is the elision of the Islamist character of the Al Qaeda militants who tyrannize East Aleppo. This is accomplished by labeling them “rebels,” while the “rebels” who tyrannize the cities the United States and its allies besiege are called “Islamic State,” ISIL” or “ISIS” fighters. The aim is to conjure the impression that US-led sieges are directed at Islamic terrorists, and therefore are justifiable, despite the humanitarian crises they precipitate, while the Syrian-led campaign in East Aleppo is directed at rebels, presumably moderates, or secular democrats, and therefore is illegitimate. This is part of a broader US propaganda campaign to create two classes of Islamist militants—good Islamists, and bad ones.


RECOMMENDED: "Iraq snapshot"
"Iraq"




Sunday, October 23, 2016

She will show her ass


BULLY BOY PRESS &   CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL AID TABLE

LIKE SLICK WILLIE, CRANKY CLINTON CANNOT BE TRUSTED.


Clinton also told me she has 'nothing to say' about Wikileaks email revealing a $12M Clinton Foundation quid-pro-quo


THE PROBLEM IS 'HANDLED' BY DISTRACTING.

CRANKY CLINTON INSISTS WIKILEAKS DID SOMETHING WRONG -- THEY DIDN'T -- AND THIS ALLOWS HER TO IGNORE QUESTIONS ABOUT WHAT WAS EXPOSED.

REACHED FOR COMMENT, CRANKY BRAYED, "JUST BE GLAD I'M NOT PULLING DOWN MY INDUSTRIAL CONTROL TOP PANTYHOSE TO EXPOSE MY BIG OL' BUTT TO YOU!"



FROM THE TCI WIRE:



Let's stay with the Wednesday debate for a second.

As many Republicans (at least those on TV) flee the GOP for the Democratic Party in order to support conservative War Hawk Hillary Clinton (who stated in the debate she would have voted to ban late term abortions -- a fact no one is discussing except for Rebecca in 'hillary would ban late term abortions'), pundits gasp or cackle this may be the end of the Republican Party.

It may be.

Which would be a reason to vote Green -- unless you're hoping that the GOP's demise means only one party.

As the Democratic Party becomes closer and closer to the Republican Party, a new party is needed.

Just as this could be the year the GOP goes down (I don't think so but it could be), this could be the year a new major party emerges: Green.

Think about all the gas baggery you've seen on so-called 'news' programs on cable about the GOP's demise.

If you're going to gas bag over that topic, then the topic that goes with it is what replaces it.

Only that hasn't prompted gas baggery.

Do we have a media or do we have a Democratic Party megaphone?

This morning Mika is again blathering on about how Donald Trump, in the debate Wednesday night, refused to say if he will accept the results.

This a non-issue.

Let's say Donald understood the question and its meanings and is planning on not accepting the results if he loses.

So what?

The Electoral College will name the winner regardless, that person will be sworn in.

Doesn't really matter what he accepts.

Hillary grandstanded on the issue as always.

But she was wrong, Al Gore did not accept the results.

That's why he filed challenges.

Yes, after the Supreme Court ruling -- one month and five days after the election -- Al Gore did concede to Bully Boy Bush.

But Al did not publicly accept the results until that moment.

'But the results were in dispute!'

Yeah, whine to someone who didn't contribute to Al Gore (I did and to the recount fund) and to someone who doesn't refer to Bully Boy Busy as BBB or "White House occupant" -- check the archives, I have never applied the p-word to BBB.  I will say "President Barack Obama," I do not use the p-wod with BBB.

The results could be disputed again.



RECOMMENDED: "Hillary and the press"
"Fox picks up our story on Bill Clinton's 'Energize..."
"Iraq snapshot"
"WikiLeaks reveals first batch of US president Bara..."
"I've had enough of these 2 jokers with malevolent ..."
"Spineless Michael Moore"
"Who paid Sheila Jackson Lee this time?"
"Emily VanCamp thinks she's smart but she's a fool"
"Greed and the Clinton Foundation"
"crooked hillary, hillary crooked"
"Donna Brazile needs to swing that closet door open already"
"JACK REACHER: NEVER GO BACK"
"Why I'm voting for Jill Stein"
"Brilliant article"
"Leave Julian Assange alone"
"Circulate this!"
"Glory hog Hillary"
"Don't be ruled by fear"
"Who protects the workers (ask a Verizon employee)"
"Are you part of the military industrial complex?"
"Sell Out Sanders"
"Hillary's struggle with African-Americans"
"Which came first: Clinton or the rotten egg?"
"THIS JUST IN! WHO'S ZOOMIN WHO?"
"hillary would ban late term abortions"
"WikiLeaks has spoken"






Friday, October 21, 2016

Which came first: Clinton or the rotten egg?

BULLY BOY PRESS &   CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL AID TABLE

THE HACKS AT POLITICO INSIST "WIKILEAKS POISONS HILLARY'S RELATIONSHIP WITH THE LEFT."

REALLY?

KIND OF SEEMS LIKE CRANKY CLINTON HERSELF POISONED THE RELATIONSHIP -- WIKILEAKS ONLY EXPOSED WHAT SHE DID AND SAID.


FROM THE TCI WIRE:




In the time since last night's debate between Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump and Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, a few important themes have developed.

First, the media wants war with Syria -- wants it very badly -- and they're already drooling over (and egging on) the renewed conflict between Russia and the US.


Elaine observed:



After the debate on ABC NEWS, Martha Raddatz was on her attack of Russia kick.

She felt the need to trash Donald Trump.

"He's doubting our intelligence agencies!"

You mean the same ones who cooked the books on Iraq, Martha?

Better question, trashy Martha.

You're a journalist.

You're supposed to be skeptical.

You're supposed to question.

Why can't you do your job?

Oh, that's right, you're a tool of imperialism.

Martha Raddatz had a freak out on air because Donald Trump dared to question the supposed conclusion of our intelligence agencies.

Poor Martha.

Someone give her a happy pill so she can go back to dreamland.





No longer is it just Martha Raddatz, unable to reach a clitoral orgasm without this war, pimping it during a debate, it's everyone after war and more war.



Talk show host Gayle King couldn't get enough of it last night on CBS' post coverage.  And by the way, hosting a daytime talk show and being Oprah's 'gal pal' really don't speak to why you're invited to opine on TV.  CBS has had the weakest staff doing post debate coverage throughout the debates.

On MSNBC's MORNING JOE today, they were whining that Donald Trump would not give them the war they wanted.




RECOMMENDED: "Iraq snapshot"
'"Clinton once again confirmed the authenticity of"...'
"Food for thought"
"even her outfits are crimes"
"Snide, smirky Hillary"
"Casey Wilson"
"The Clinton's open marriage"
"THIS JUST IN! CLINTON THE SWINGER!"
"Hillary seems rattled"
"Trashy Hillary Clinton"
"Does anyone believe Hillary?"
"Martha Raddatz freaks out on air!"
"Such a nasty woman"
"Donald won the debate"
"Why does Hillary keep stumbling over her words and looking down?"





Wednesday, October 19, 2016

Friday, October 14, 2016

More leaks

BULLY BOY PRESS &   CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL AID TABLE

CRANKY CLINTON'S IN AN UPROAR YET AGAIN AS NEW REVELATIONS EMERGE THAT SHE MAY STILL BE HIDING E-MAILS -- THESE EXCHANGED BETWEEN HERSELF AND FADED CELEBRITY IN CHIEF BARRY O.

REACHED FOR COMMENT BY THESE REPORTERS, CRANKY RESPONDED, "WHAT THE HELL!  ALL THIS LEAKING!  I DIDN'T LEAK LIKE THIS WHEN I WAS NURSING CHELSEA! LOOK, THIS WHOLE BLAME RUSSIA THING DOESN'T LOOK LIKE IT'S WORKING SO LET ME CHANGE THE NARRATIVE AND FLIP THE SCRIPT.  FROM NOW ON CALL ME BIG MAMA HRC -- YEAH, I'M THE HRC IN THIS HOUSE!"


FROM THE TCI WIRE:



US President Barack Obama is hoping to both bolster his legacy and deliver the election to War Hawk Hillary Clinton via a 'victory' in Mosul.

Mosul was seized by the Islamic State in June of 2014.  Over two years later, it's suddenly time, a month before the US presidential election, to liberate or 'liberate' it.

And you get US government spokespersons trying to gin up US public interest with press releases like "Liberating Mosul Will Be Iraq's Biggest Fight, OIR Spokesman Says."


So -- get this -- the US government is preparing.

Preparing for propaganda, preparing for using Iraq, preparing for lying . . .

Preparing for everything, apparently, except helping Iraqis.

Reminder:


Shahad, 3, in a tent in a camp south of , is one of 4.7 million children in who currently requires humanitarian assistance.










Iraq's already got a displacement crisis.




Shahad, 3, in a tent in a camp south of , is one of 4.7 million children in who currently requires humanitarian assistance.











Liberating or 'liberating' Mosul will result in more displacement.


This is a known.  Where is the preparation by Barack to deal with that?



We call for genuinely safe routes for civilians to escape fighting & get to the shelter/help they need:













An assault on Mosul risks 600,000 children's lives. Children will be in the line of fire - unless we act now











Many are warning what's coming.  There's no excuse for Barack's failure to prepare for this.  The White House better get on it and if they fail in this task the news outlets might want to try to remember there's supposed to be a difference between journalism and hagiography.


Recommended: "Iraq snapshot"
"Iraq snapshot"
"Donald Trump denies accusations of two women (as a..."
"Iraq snapshot"
"Iraq snapshot"
"Priorities"
"Hejira"
"Isaiah's THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS "Stand Up Hilla..."
"Kat's Korner: The Lesbian Who Preferred Men"
"Bees"
"DR. STRANGE"
"Hillary has to answer"
"They don't work for us"
"applause for jake tapper"
"Yea for THE YOUNG TURKS!"
"Throw her in jail already"
"Who trusts the press? (Not us - screams America)"
"Return of the bitch boy"