BULLY BOY PRESS & CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL-AID TABLE
"NOTHING NEW TO OFFER" WAS THE THEME IN CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA ALL WEEK.
THE QUESTION WAS, "DO WE HAVE ANYTHING NEW TO SHOW YOU?'
OVER AND OVER, THE ANSWER CAME BACK, "HELL NO!"
IN A MARATHON SPEECH LAST NIGHT, FORMER PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON TRIED TO MAKE THE CASE FOR THE "BRASS"-LESS BARRY O. ON AND ON HE WENT, GIVING NEW MEANING TO THE TERM "WINDS OF WAR," AS IF HE COULD FILIBUSTER THE AMERICAN VOTERS, SHOUT THEM DOWN, FORCE UNEMPLOYMENT AND RECESSION TO RETREAT IN THE FACE OF THE SHEER BULK OF HIS WORDS.
AND IT WAS THE KIND OF FIGHT AMERICANS SAW THROUGHOUT THE 90S, PART OF THE REASON THEY PUT THEIR TRUST IN BILL CLINTON. IT WAS LUDICROUS AND NEVER ENDING AND ONLY SOMEONE WHO WAS WILLING TO FIGHT FOR AMERICANS COULD GO ON THAT WAY.
IF BILL CLINTON WERE RUNNING FOR A THIRD TERM AS PRESIDENCY, HE COULD HAVE SEALED THE DEAL LAST NIGHT.
BUT HE'S NOT AND AS THE AUDITORIUM ERUPTED IN APPLAUSE WHO SHOULD STROLL ON TO THE STAGE LOOKING LIKE HE'D JUST AWOKEN FROM A QUICK NAP BUT BARRY O REMINDING EVERYONE YET AGAIN HOW THERE ARE THOSE WHO DO AND THERE ARE THOSE WHO JUST FEEL ENTITLED.
FROM THE TCI WIRE:
Yesterday the embarrassing Democratic National Convention began. Ruth Conniff (The Progressive)
was late in getting her whoring on but this is the woman who bragged on
KPFA that she didn't know anyone who'd fought in the Iraq War. Didn't
know them and apparently didn't want to get to know them because it's
really not that hard, Ruth. Nor are facts though Ruth is a fact
molester who should be on a neighborhood watch. Writing today, she gets
her whore on in a number of ways. First, she praises Michelle Obama's
embarrassing speech. As Marcia noted yesterday, "The Washington Post reports
that Michelle Obama explained today her role in the DNC convention
tonight was to explain her husband. That may be but there's something
very sad about the fact that anyone has to explain who the president is
and goes to the fact that he is so hollow at his core and so
meaningless." Four years later and she had to explain, to the American
people, who her husband was? Apparently all that golfing didn't leave
much of an impression.
Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act does not, as Michelle Obama claimed, "help women get equal pay for equal work" at all. As Rebecca pointed out last night,
all that act does is let you sue a little longer. If Barack wanted
equal pay for equal work, he could have pushed that. He didn't. But
now he wants to inflate his meager resume?
Michelle
got creative with this claim as well, "That's why Barack has fought so
hard to increase student aid and keep interest rates down, because he
wants every young person to fulfill their promsie and be able to attend
college without a mountain of debt." No, that would be Dr. Jill Stein's
desire, the Green Party candidate. Barack doesn't give a damn.
From the left, Nancy Hanover (WSWS) explained that back in May:
The
dirty secret in all of this, carefully hidden in the media, is the
active role of the Democratic Party and specifically the Obama
administration in the assault on higher education. At the most
fundamental level, the Democrats have colluded with the Republicans in
the systematic starvation of education while diverting society's
resources into endless wars, tax cuts for the rich, and bank and
corporate bailouts.
Despite Obama's claims
that he is doing all he can to "make college more affordable," he has
implemented a whole battery of measures to attack student borrowers—a
broadside attack on the young generation.
Effective
July 1, 2012, the federal government has ended the in-school interest
subsidy for graduate and professional students with Stafford Loans. This
relatively little-reported event was enacted as part of the 2011 Budget
Control Act. It will substantially increase the cost of graduate
school, already notoriously expensive, and will add an estimated $18
billion to student debt burdens over 10 years. Seventy-six percent of US
graduate school students borrow to cover tuition, and their yearly
costs vary from $15,000 to $45,000 for tuition alone.
The
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2012 eliminated the grace period
benefit (a six- or nine-month window after a student leaves school when
no payments are due) for loans made in academic years 2012-2013 and
2013-2014, automatically increasing the net cost of the loan.
Also
effective immediately and retroactively, students are only eligible for
six full-time years of the Pell Grant, a decision primarily affecting
low-income adults working their way through college. The measure will
eliminate benefits for 63,000 recipients. Also, students may no longer
receive two Pell Grants in a year or receive summer school funding. The
government has also modified the amount families are expected to pay,
the Expected Family Contribution, so that fewer students will be
eligible for the grants.
Smaller Pell Grant
awards of $277 to $550 have been cut completely. Also eliminated are
the Pell Grants for students who pass the "ability to benefit" test but
have not been awarded a high school diploma or GED.
The
convention itself is an assult on education by being held in
anti-teacher Charlotte (anti-teacher, anti-union) and by the little film
attacking education which then featured a panel with human education
leper Michelle Rhee. Change.org may have been forced to drop Rhee and her lunatic fringe group
(which wants to end the "public" in public education to allow for a
corporate take over) but damned if Barack didn't make sure that piece of
trash had a prominent spot at his convention.
If
you're like Ruth Conniff and barely pay attention to the world around
you, not only do you not know anyone who served in Iraq, you also don't
recognize an assault on education when it's right before your eyes. If
only Ruth could work as hard as she did in 2004 when she wrote that hit
piece on Ralph Nader for her trashy magazine.
Ruth
wants you to know that, "The most progressive side of the Democratic
Party was on full display (after Rahm Emanuel left the stage)." Really?
What about when Tammy Duckworth was on the stage?
Is anyone less informed than Ruth Conniff?
Tammy
Duckworth was hand picked by Rahm to run in 2006. A lot of people
forget that race now or just remember it because Tammy lost big on what
should have been a Democratic seat. But Emanual and Tammy thought she
could run in this district (that she wasn't living in) and jump over
Christine Cegelis who had taken on Henry Hyde in 2004 and come close to
toppling Hyde. Now it was supposed to be Christine's race. (If you're
late to the party on this, there are many articles you can refer to but
the strongest is probably Matt Renner's September 2007 piece for TruthOut.
If audio archives existed, we'd point to Laura Flanders radio show in
2006, during the primary where she talked up Tammy Duckworth like crazy
only to have her listeners explaine that the progressive candidate in
that race was Christine. To Flanders credit, she didn't rage or act
like she was perfect. She acknowledged her mistake and booked Cegelis
onto the show.)
But the problem was Christine
actually was and is a progressive. For example, she wanted an end to
the Iraq War -- a clear difference between herself and Tammy Duckworth
-- one no one's supposed to comment on today. If there's anything more
oblivious than Ruth Conniff, it's POLITICO which is surpised that
"Right applauds Tammy Duckworth's speech." That's not a surprise, she
is a right-winger.
What is a surprise is that a
member of the failed Veterans Administration could run for office and
not have to answer as to how the backlog has repeatedly increased in the
last four years. That is truly surprising. She felt comfortable slamming GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney for not mentioning Afghanistan
but can someone explain why this fromer Assistant Secretary for Public
and Intergovernmental Affairs at the VA didn't mention the backlog?
That
number is huge and it's so huge that the VA tries to backpeddle and
present it as less than it is. Most recently we saw that in the July
18th House Oversight Subcommittee on National Security, Homeland Defense
and Foreign Operations hearing. VA's Undersectretary for Benefits
Allison Hickey was testifying. From that day's snapshot:
Jason
Chaffetz: Madam Under Secretary, Mr. Manar, I think accurately
points out in his testimony that in order to solve the problem, you need
to know exactly what the problem is. And I see a major discrepancy in
some of the numbers and I want to help clarfiy that. In youre
testimony in talking about the integrated disability evaluation system,
you say, "We went from 240 day average in the legacy system to 56 days"
and it goes on. And there's a definition of the backlog. The House
Armed Services Committee staff and the House Veterans Affairs Committee
staff on July 13 of this year which was not too long ago gave a briefing
to these two Committees. It says in here that the current monthly
average completion time is 408 days. You say it's 56 days -- 54 days --
yeah, 56 days -- and they say it's 408 days. Can you help clarify
that for me please?
Allison Hickey:
Thank you, Chairman Chaffetz for your question. First of all, allow me
to clarify by stating a few basic definitions so also, as I say things,
you can understand what words I'm using and their context We have,
in the inventory and pending an overall number of 854000. That's not
backlog. Those are claims that even as we've been sitting here for the
last ten to fifteen minutes, more claims have come into us from veteran
service members and
Chair Jason Chaffetz: Okay, let me stop you -- let me stop you right there. Let me stop you right there. On July 16th, which is not very long ago, the Monday morning workload report says there are 919,461 claims. You say that number is -- what did you say that number is? 860,000 something?
Allison Hickey: The numbers I'm using are 854,000 --
Chair Jason Chaffetz: Okay, so we're off by about 50 or 60 thousand. And we're talking about something that is just couple of days old. Why the discrepancy on those number?
Allison Hickey: Chairman Chaffetz, our backlog -- I mean our inventory is a dynamic inventory.
Chair Jason Chaffetz: I know but that's less than ten days so --
Allison Hickey: Chairman, I'm happy to answer the questions if I'm allowed an opportunity.
Chair Jason Chaffetz: Sure I want to know. You're saying that that number is 800 and something thousand and I'm just saying that the VA's report says it's 919,461. That's of July 16th --
Allison Hickey: Chairman, I'm happy to answer the question if I'm allowed an opportunity.
Chair Jason Chaffetz: Ma'am, just answer the question. Yes.
Allison Hickey: Thank you very much.
Chair Jason Chaffetz: -- That's why I asked the question.
Allison
Hickey: Thank you very much, Chairman. The numbers that I'm using are
from the endpoint of a month. Probably the end of May. So you
probably are using the end of this week's report. I chose not use a
floating number that continues to change over time and over dates and
over weeks. So I used an end of month number to be able to to talk to
you, to be able to have a solid number to hvae a discussion around.
US
House Rep and Subcommittee Chair Jason Chaffetz had the correct number.
Notice the disregard on VA's part. They could have used a number only a
few days old. Didn't want to do that. And Allison Hickey, who is
offering the number, can't even state what the numbers from: "Probably
the end of May." Probably? You're testifying that the backlog is X and
you can't tell the Subcomittee when that number was generated? Can't
or won't? There's no one in the VA that should be running for public
office. Everyone of them should instead be begging veterans for
forgiveness.
And if Mitt Romney had any brains
at all, he'd unearth the story the press buried, where Eric Shinseki,
VA Secretary, admits in an open session of Congress that he knew nearly
nine months before the start of the fall 2009 college semester that the
GI bill checks would not be ready. For those who've forgotten, VA's
idiocy and refusal to do its job left many veterans forced to take out
short term loans, left them without apartments and some didn't get
checks until after Christmas 2009, which meant their children did
without Christmas. Tammy Duckworth was a part of the VA during that,
she has a lot of nerve trying to run for office on her 'record.'
If you missed that moment -- the press buried it to protect Shinseki and the White House, we covered it -- you can drop back to October 14, 2009, when Shinseki told the House Committee on Veterans Affairs:
Secretary
Eric Shinseki: I'm looking at the certificates of eligibility uh being
processed on 1 May and enrollments 6 July, checks having to flow through
August. A very compressed timeframe. And in order to do that, we
essentially began as I arrived in January, uh, putting together the plan
-- reviewing the plan that was there and trying to validate it. I'll be
frank, when I arrived, uh, there were a number of people telling me
this was simply not executable. It wasn't going to happen. Three August
was going to be here before we could have everything in place. Uh, to
the credit of the folks in uh VA, I, uh, I consulted an outside
consultant, brought in an independent view, same kind of assessment.
'Unless you do some big things here, this is not possible.' To the
credit of the folks, the good folks in VBA, they took it on and they
went at it hard. We hired 530 people to do this and had to train them.
We had a manual system that was computer assisted. Not very helpful
but that's what they inherited. And we realized in about May that the
530 were probably a little short so we went and hired 230 more people.
So in excess of 700 people were trained to use the tools that were
coming together even as certificates were being executed. Uhm, we were
short on the assumption of how many people it would take.
He
was told the plan wasn't executable. He brought in independent
consultants. They told him the same thing. Congress was never, ever
informed of this problem nor were veterans. And when fall 2009 rolled
around, veterans didn't have their checks.
This
wasn't a surprise as the press has apparently agreed to pretend. By
Shinseki's own testimony, early in his term, he was told the plan
couldn't be executed, he even brought in independent consultants who
told the same thing.
He refused to inform
Congress. Veterans suffered as a result. He should have been fired but
Barack Obama's provided no oversight of the VA and that's why the VA
backlog has grown and grown and grown.
There's no excuse for it and Tammy Duckworth is the last person to finger point at anyone else.
The
ridiculous Ruth Conniff claimed, "A full-throated defense of labor and
of keeping American jobs at home was also a rousing theme, with many,
many references to Obama's rescue of the auto industry." Who got
rescued, you idiot? The managers, the owners? Yeah. The workers? No,
they got screwed in the bail-out. All those dollars tossed at Big Auto
which then wants to tell the workers that they'll have to give us this
benefit and that cost of living . . . As Glen Ford (Black Agenda Report) observes
today, "Frankly, who wants to be the one to point out, in the middle of
the festivities, that Michelle Obama was just a Chicago Daley machine
hack lawyer who was rewarded with a quarter million dollar a year job of
neutralizing community complaints against the omnivorous University of
Chicago Hospitals? She resigned from her $50,000 seat on the board of
directors of Tree-House Foods, a major Wal-Mart supplier, early in her
husband's presidential campaign. But, once in the White House, the First
Lady quickly returned to flaking for Wal-Mart, praising the anti-union "death star" behemoth's inner city groceries offensive as part of her White House healthy foods booster duties. "
Recommended: "Iraq snapshot"
"A year later, the assassination of Hadi al-Mahdi s..."
"Kim Rivera and war resistance"
"When NPR let's the nation speak, it forgets women"
"Curiosity"
"At last, the truth about ObamaCare (rationing)"
"oh, lily"
"RJ Ellroy"
"F**k you, All Songs Considered"
"The Barack economy"
"What a lousy speech"
"It's a yes or it's a no"
"The convention"
"The real point of ObamaCare"
"THIS JUST IN! KICKING GRANNY OFF HEALTH CARE!"
No comments:
Post a Comment