Saturday, September 06, 2014

If he's lost Kim . . .

BULLY BOY PRESS &    CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL-AID TABLE

FADED CELEBRITY IN CHIEF BARRY O GOT SOME STINGING CRITICISM FROM KIM KARDASHIAN -- AKA THE SWEET ONE.

SHE TOOK HIM TO TASK FOR HIS CRITICISM OF HER AND OF HER HUSBAND AND FOR CALLING HER HUSBAND AN "A**HOLE."

SHE WONDERED WHAT THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES WAS EVEN DOING WEIGHING IN ON POP CULTURE TO BEGIN WITH, IMPLYING THAT HE HAS MUCH MORE IMPORTANT THINGS TO DO.

SILLY KIM, HE REALLY DOESN'T.

THAT'S ABOUT ALL HE CAN HANDLE, CATTY REMARKS ABOUT OTHERS.

FROM THE TCI WIRE:


Russ Wellen, liar or fool?

The Foreign Policy In Focus blogger can never seem to get the facts right.

He's not helped by the fact that he basis his bad article ("Five Ways have aided and abetted the development of the Islamir State'') on Andrew Cockburn's lousy fly-over reporting.  But he has only himself to blame for this nonsense:



The general state of chaos in which the United States left Iraq with, to this day, no strong central government. 

How stupid does he have to be to write that?  Or is he just a lousy liar?


Those of us who actually paid attention to the issue of Iraq over the last years know damn well that Nouri implemented a power grab and did so with no objection from FPIF which had no time for Iraq.  And now it wants to play catch up and, lazy student, uses Andrew Cockburn's (bad and biased) reporting to play catch up.

Is it any wonder that Wellen and Foreign Policy In Focus are fumbling in the dark?

Nouri's corruption did not begin in his second term.

Congress heard repeatedly about his corruption.

In fact, Barack heard repeatedly --

Oh, wait, he didn't.

Had he attended Committee hearings in 2007 and 2008, he would have heard about Nouri's corruption but, of course, he was too busy for hearings, rushing in only when the cameras were present.

His desire to take over the central bank and the courts were already well known.

But when he made those efforts in his second term, FPIF didn't say one damn word.  If Russ missed these events, he'll never find them in Patrick Cockburn's writings filled with lust for thug Nouri.  

Lust for war is something FPIF would rail against if it had any guts.

It has no guts and no spine.

Strolling through the western press on Iraq today is very depressing.

Iraqis still don't matter.

The Islamic State, we are told, are 'barbaric,' vile and many other things.

And the proof?

One American journalist and one American and Israeli journalist were killed.

Their deaths are unfortunate.

But this is the basis for worst terrorists ever?

In fairness to the press, the White House -- both US President Barack Obama and US Vice President Joe Biden -- repeat similar statements near constantly -- that these deaths will be avenged and blah, blah, blah.

Not only does this nonsense erase Iraqis and their suffering from the public history, it also shows an extreme ignorance of history -- from early US history all the way up to at least the Symbionese Liberation Army.

The deaths are regrettable but they're justification for massive military maneuvers?

It's like a retelling of Helen of Troy done in a house of mirrors.



RECOMMENDED: "Iraq snapshot"
"If the White House is done blustering . "
"War Crimes?"
"Bruce Springsteen"
"Barack's expansion"
"the queen is dead"
"Too soon"
"Joan Rivers"
"A legend passed"
"Can we talk?"
"The family speaks"
"THIS JUST IN! FROM HIS OWN BROTHER!"

  • Thursday, September 04, 2014

    The family speaks

    BULLY BOY PRESS &    CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL-AID TABLE

    THEY SAY YOUR FAMILY KNOWS YOU BEST.

    FADED CELEBRITY BARRY O BETTER HOPE NOT.

    HIS HALF-BROTHER'S PUBLISHING A BOOK CALLING BARRY O "A STUCK UP A**HOLE."


    FROM THE TCI WIRE:




    We've heard of an embarrassment of riches, right?  Today, it's just a wealth of embarrassments as far as the eye can see.

    Take US Vice President Joe Biden.  I know Joe.  I like Joe -- hell, I love Joe.

    But come on.

    David Sharp (AP) quotes Joe declaring today that "they [the Islamic State] should know we will follow them to the gates of hell until they are brought to justice.  Because hell is where they'll reside."

    Now look, if Joe wants to visit Dick and Lynne Cheney, that's his business and right, but leave out all this "we" stuff because the bulk of us have no desire to go to hell and visit the Cheneys.


    On a more serious note, it has to be asked, "At the gates of hell, what will you be doing, Joe?"

    Lawyering up? 

    I ask because you could have served in Vietnam.  Unlike many women and men (including me), you didn't oppose the war so, being a man, you could have served in combat.

    You didn't.

    You weren't even a photographer like Al Gore.

    So at the gates of hell, what exactly are you able to do?

    For your own safety, Joe, you need to ask that question.

    For others also.

    Always a lot of male bragging, very little actual male bravery.

    Take "Ali."  He's an Iraqi soldier -- one Human Rights Watch trusted.

    I wouldn't trust him.

    His unit made the mistake of trusting him, he's alive and they're dead.

    Heather Saul (Belfast Telegraph) explains Ali claims he survived the executions most Iraqi soldiers he was with experienced.

    He crawled away wounded?

    No, he played dead.


    Let's get bravery clear, a young girl, Anne Frank, living in hiding is brave.  Anne had no gun, Anne had no combat training, she was not part of a military unit.


    You may call someone with a gun and training who refuses to use both to take out the enemy or attempt to save those he or she was serving with "lucky" (you might not) but most people wouldn't repeat the story.

    Most people would realize they look a little weak and cowardly.

    I don't believe in war and if Ali put down his gun in protest of death and destruction, I'd be the first to applaud him for that.

    But that didn't happen, did it?


    Ali was and remains pro-war.  He's willing for the fighting to continue.

    But, as we've now learned, when push comes to shove, he'll pretend to be dead while his unit is shot and killed.  He'll save his own life by refusing to risk it to help out his comrades.

    I don't know why you'd trust a word out of the mouth of Ali.

    Again, give me a Kyle Snyder, a Joshua Key, someone who is opposed to the war and I'll back them and applaud them.  But give me a pro-war man or woman who, in combat, refuses to defend his or her fellow soldiers?

    That's a coward.

    And it's a shame his unit didn't know that going into the battle against the Islamic State.




    RECOMMENDED: "Iraq snapshot"
    "The (successful) Intimidation of Barack"
    "A War Hawk flutters"
    "Can we believe them?"
    "Crazy Joe"
    "To be Movieline, Guess Who Don't Sue"
    "Barack's not all that speech"
    "That lying media"
    "update on joan rivers"
    "I pissed off a friend today . . ."
    "1225"
    "Look how they lie"
    "Even Time turns on him"
    "THIS JUST IN! GRASPING AT STRAWS!"

    Wednesday, September 03, 2014

    Even Time turns on him

    BULLY BOY PRESS &    CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL-AID TABLE

    POOR FADED CELEBRITY IN CHIEF BARRY O, EVEN TIME IS PANNING HIS LATEST SPEECH:

    The rhetoric hit its marks. The message, however, was muddled.
    As he finished his speaking engagements, several questions remained about how he intends to deal with the multiple foreign policy crises facing his administration.


    REACHED FOR COMMENT, BARRY O SPUTTERED TO THESE REPORTERS, "B-B-B-UT THE RHETORIC, THEY LOVED THE RHETORIC AT LEAST!"


    FROM THE TCI WIRE:


    Barack will do whatever he wants to do.
    A large number of Americans favor single-payer, universal health care similar to what they have in Canada and other countries dubbed "first world countries."  (Iraq has this sort of health care, by the way.)  But that didn't force Barack into pushing that through Congress.  No, Americans were made prisoners of insurance companies -- sheer coincidence, you understand, that the insurance lobby had been big donors to his 2008 campaign.
    Time and again, Barack does what he wants -- which is generally move further to the right.
    So stop typing up your sexual fantasies of the maiden Barack spirited out the window of his bedroom, tossed over the shoulder of some kissy-faced brute.
    They're insulting.  
    Barack does what he wants to do.
    TE and others repeatedly offer excuses not to be mad at Barack.  A flat out lie becomes "a lame cover story" and Barack's actions of war are things he really, cross TE's heart, didn't want to do.  So don't feel outrage, don't wonder if you should be in the streets.  

    Barack is really, really like torn and stuff, he's like really, really not wanting to do this.  So, you feel me, cut him some slack.  Being president is like a really tough job and stuff.
    Digging ditches is a tough job.  Scrubbing toilets is a tough job.  Raising kids is a tough job.
    Giving four years of your life so you get pension and health care and you and your family get bodyguards for life?  So your wife gets her own pension because you were president?  
    These and so many other perks don't go to ditch diggers.  Or maids.  Or stay-at-home parents, day care workers, nannies, etc. 
    In addition to the fact that the job should be one of the greatest professional honors any American citizen could have.
    So let's all stop supplicating and whining about 'poor Barack.'
    He does what he wants to do.

    So today what he wants to do is send more US troops into Iraq.

    White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest issued the following statement tonight:
    Today, the President authorized the Department of Defense to fulfill a Department of State request for approximately 350 additional U.S. military personnel to protect our diplomatic facilities and personnel in Baghdad, Iraq. This action was taken at the recommendation of the Department of Defense after an extensive interagency review, and is part of the President’s commitment to protect our personnel and facilities in Iraq as we continue to support the Government of Iraq in its fight against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL). These additional forces will not serve in a combat role.
    The President has made clear his commitment to doing whatever is required to provide the necessary security for U.S. personnel and facilities around the world. The request he approved today will allow some previously deployed military personnel to depart Iraq, while at the same time providing a more robust, sustainable security force for our personnel and facilities in Baghdad.
    In addition to our efforts to protect our personnel, we will continue to support the Government of Iraq’s efforts to counter ISIL, which poses a threat not only to Iraq, but to the broader Middle East and U.S. personnel and interests in the region. The President will be consulting this week with NATO allies regarding additional actions to take against ISIL and to develop a broad-based international coalition to implement a comprehensive strategy to protect our people and to support our partners in the fight against ISIL. As part of this effort, Secretary Kerry, Secretary Hagel, and President Obama’s counterterrorism advisor, Lisa Monaco, will be traveling separately to the region in the near-term to build a stronger regional partnership.

      Chelsea J. Carter and Jomana Karadsheh (CNN) report, "The new troops will bring the number of American troops in Iraq to well over 1,000, with most serving either as diplomatic security or military advisers to Iraq's security forces."  Jamie Dupree (WSB Radio, Cox Media Group) adds, "The extra 350 military personnel would bring the total of American servicemembers in Iraq to around 1,300, acting in roles as military advisers or for protection of U.S. diplomats inside Iraq."  Spencer Ackerman (Guardian) offers, "Intentionally or not, Obama has effectively responded to Isis by signaling an intensification of the latest US war in Iraq. Obama has now launched 124 airstrikes against Isis since 8 August, while swearing not to introduce 'combat boots on the ground'."





    RECOMMENDED: "The (successful) Intimidation of Barack"
    "Iraq snapshot"
    "WhistleBlower Apologizes to Andy Wakefield..."
    "The death of Amnesty International?"
    "'We must protect the dam!' is soooo last week"
    "At least 1635 violent deaths in Iraq for the month..."
    "Miller Statement on VA OIG Review of Phoenix VA He..."
    "Statement by NSC Spokesperson Caitlin Hayden on th..."
    "Weekly Address: This Labor Day, Let’s Talk About t..."
    "Kurdish independence?"
    "‘Young workers are key to fighting poverty wages’ ..."
    "Talking entry"
    "Remarks by the President to the American Legion Na..."
    "350 more?"
    "Does Lois Lerner run the government?"
    "Iraq and the fool"
    "Oh, useless Ralph Nader"
    "What's going to happen to crappy websites?"
    "Pissed"
    "joan rivers remains on life support"
    "Amnesty International = embarrassment"
    "Sin City: A Dame To Kill For"
    "On this and that"

    "Misty"
    "THIS JUST IN! CALL HIM MISTY!"


    Sunday, August 31, 2014

    Misty

    BULLY BOY PRESS &    CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL-AID TABLE

    WHAT'S CONSIDERED TIMID AND SKITTISH?

    NO, NOT A KITTEN.

    FADED CELEBRITY BARRY O.

    HE'S LIKE A KITTEN UP A TREE.


    FROM THE TCI WIRE:



    We'll start with this Tweet.








    Iraq -- US F-18 fighter jet refuels from a U.S. Air Force KC-135 Stratotanker aircraft over northern Iraq 






    Thursday, the State Dept's Brett McGurk Tweeted, "Today in #Iraq, US air strikes against #ISIS terrorists destroyed four armed vehicles, a humvee, tank, construction vehicle, & checkpoint."  AP notes this was the 106th US bombing in Iraq since August 8th.

    Cedric and Wally emphasized the financial cost on Friday noting that a cost of $7.5 million a day means at least $555 million through Friday which would be over a half-billion dollars.

    That's not coming out of US President Barack Obama's pocket, the US tax payer is footing the bill.

    It's a bill that continues to grow.

    The US taxpayer didn't authorize the bill and certainly wasn't consulted about putting more money on the tab.
    They're not even informed what the plan is because there is no plan.  Karen DeYoung (Washington Post) reports:

    Amid conflicting congressional demands, impatient Arab allies, and public concern that he will do too much or too little, President Obama made bluntly clear Thursday why he has not yet implemented a comprehensive U.S. response to the Islamist insurgency that is rapidly spreading across the Middle East.
    “We don’t have a strategy yet,” Obama said, in response to questions about when he is prepared to begin military action in Syria, and, if not, why not?

    White House spokesperson Josh Earnest has made the media rounds insisting that Iraq is not without a strategy, just Syria.

    That's spin, not truth.

    The White House continues to link Syria and Iraq so, if they have no plan for Syria, then they have no plan for Iraq.

    The White House presents the Islamic State as darting back and forth between Syria and Iraq -- which share a border -- and doing damage in both countries as part of a larger, coherent plan to implement a fundamentalist state.

    Is that correct?

    Who knows.  They've never backed it up.

    Asked why what is taking place is taking place, from the State Dept to the White House, they can't provide concrete answers.  They can talk 'barbaric' and other rhetoric.  They can assert that the entire Middle East is at risk and, more recently, that the US mainland is at risk.

    It's a cute little fear fantasy.

    It dissolves a bit if you apply common sense to it.

    Syria and Iraq share a border.

    Syria also shares a border with Turkey.

    Is the Islamic State somehow intimidated by Turkey?

    Or by Israel or Jordan?

    Syria borders Iraq, Turkey, Israel and Jordan.

    And just off the coast of Syria, to its west, you have the Republic of Cyprus.

    If you were a terrorist group intent on taking territory -- which really seems more like the goal of a group of invaders (and historically we've not referred to such groups as terrorists) -- wouldn't Cyprus be your first target?

    It's small.  It's an island -- meaning you could monitor incoming and outgoing traffic much easier than with landlocked countries.

    It's a bit of a resort island which, for most people, would say 'soft target' -- especially when contrasted with a large country.

    Syria's not responsible for Iraq but the US government has wanted war with the Syrian government for some time.  They wanted it under Bully Boy Bush -- remember the diplomatic tiffs -- and they want it under Barack.


    A connection that Syria and Iraq do have -- that can be established factually -- is that Sunnis and Shi'ites are going into both countries to fight.  In both countries -- and this is what has given IS its power -- Sunnis feel persecuted.

    You can argue whether they are or not.

    That's really pointless.

    The perception is they are being persecuted.

    That perception is strong and growing.




    RECOMMENDED: "Talking entry"
    "Remarks by the President to the American Legion Na..."
    "Iraq snapshot"
    "Barack on Iraq"
    "Barack re-writes rules of war"
    "Mahdi"
    "Extant (what's going on)"
    "joan"
    "Extant (Ethan)"
    "Barack has no skill set"
    "Considering the legality"
    "Captain America and Joan Rivers"
    "Prince"
    "Extant"
    "Eugene Robinson finds his voice"
    "And we thought the suit was bad"
    "THIS JUST IN! THE SUIT WASN'T THE ONLY DISASTER!"