BULLY BOY PRESS & CEDRIC'S BIG MIX -- THE KOOL AID TABLE
WIKILEAKS' JULIAN ASSANGE HAS ANNOUNCED ANOTHER UPCOMING LEAK OF E-MAILS REGARDING CRANKY CLINTON -- E-MAILS HE SAYS COULD IMPACT THE 2016 ELECTION.
REACHED FOR COMMENT BY THESE REPORTERS, CRANKY CLINTON RESPONDED, "OH S**T!"
AND THEN FARTED.
BEFORE REPEATING "OH S**T!" AND ASKING US TO PLEASE NOT REPORT ON HER FART DUE TO HEALTH CONCERNS IN THE PRESS.
FROM THE TCI WIRE:
Cheryl lost her husband in Iraq. Then Trump's company targeted her and scammed her out of $35,000.
She lost $35,000?
That has to be one of the worst things ever . . .
Wait a second.
Iraq War widow?
So Hillary has the woman's husband killed and then wants to act as though the $35,000 is the larger crime?
There is no 'moral' ground for Hillary to stand on.
She's a War Hawk and a liar.
She and her cult of liars have tried to water down her vote (and ignore her support) for the Iraq War.
Some, comfortable in the knowledge that Elizabeth Edwards is dead, try to trot out the lie that Hillary was only voting for what she hoped was a UN resolution that would follow.
That's a lie.
Elizabeth called it a lie when she was alive noting that her husband John Edwards did that but that Hillary was supporting war regardless.
As Eric Draitser (COUNTERPUNCH) pointed out yesterday:
Clinton explained to the Council on Foreign Relations in December 2003, “I was one who supported giving President Bush the authority, if necessary, to use force against Saddam Hussein. I believe that that was the right vote….I stand by the vote.” Of course this was in the immediate aftermath of the invasion of Iraq and subsequent capture of Saddam Hussein, a time when one could still justify support for a war that, just a few years later, proved to be politically unpalatable, to say nothing of it being an egregious war crime, as we all knew from the beginning.
And Hillary was not perturbed in the slightest at the hundreds of thousands of women and children whose lives were irrevocably destroyed by the war and its aftermath, one which is still being reckoned with today.
Or as Cindy Sheehan puts it:
The bottom-line is that the Democrat nominee is already a devoted war criminal and the Republican nominee attracts scary support but No Lives will Matter (except the lives of the 1%) to whichever one of these two scoundrels "wins" in November.
Hillary's war killed a woman's husband and Hillary wants to whine that the widow then lost money?
Maybe she did. I don't know and I have no reason to doubt the widow.
But I also have no reason to listen to Hillary Clinton on 'loss.'
She's a War Hawk.
And I gave her a chance.
Check the archives. In 2008, I was able to say, "Okay, maybe the Iraq War vote was a mistake like she (weakly) says." But then she went on to become Secretary of State and her war streak isn't a streak, it's her full body.
She's a War Hawk.
And she's got no higher ground to stand on from which to point at others.
Frank Erickson wonders to the editors of the DULUTH NEWS TRIBUNE, "How do those who are going to vote for Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton excuse away her support for the Iraq War? "
They rewrite history.
They ignore the reality that she did nothing to help Iraqi women -- even when a friend and colleague was asking her to do something very minor.
They minimize or ignore her innate secrecy, her disregard for public consent and act as though it's just e-mails.
"Isaiah, greedy Hillary and more"
"Barack talks to Barbara"
"My great uncle's voting for who?"
"Gloria Steinem praised War Criminal Henry Kissinger"
"glenn greenwald explains the donations to the clinton foundation"
"'The Affordable Care Act (ACA) is increasingly acknowledged to be a disaster'"
"My thoughts on FORBES list of highest paid actresses"
"She was a threat"
"I want Jill Stein to be President"
"The Clinton Piggy Bank and more"
"What I'm reading"
"Pence hits her with a truth bomb"
"THIS JUST IN! CRANKY PRETENDS TO BE INTERESTED IN ETHICS!"