Cedric's Big Mix

Monday, March 21, 2022

Whoopi and Nancy -- two crazed monsters

BULLY BOY PRESS & CEDRIC'S BIG MIX & THOMAS FRIEDMAN IS A GREAT MAN & ANN'S BIG MIX-- THE KOOL AID TABLE

THE GURU OF HATE, WHOOPI GOLDBERG, TOOK HER SIT-DOWN HATE ACT AND TURNED IT ON LEGENDARY SINGER AND ACTRESS DIANA ROSS.

WHAT HAD NO VIEW WHOOPI SO ANGRY SHE NEARLY EXPLODED?

DIANA ROSS' NEW RELEASE "I STILL BELIEVE.''

WHAT HAS WHOOPI HOPPING MAD? THE LYRICS TO THE SONG WHICH INCLUDE:

In love, I still believe
It's all I ever need
The reason that I breathe
I just can't get enough
An old familiar friend
Call it Heaven sent
It never has to end
I still believe in love
Love
Pulling me up
Whenever I'm down
Giving me the faith I lost, but now I've found
Bringing me joy
Giving me life
Looking forward, I can leave my past behind
Darling, put your hands in mine
We're just having a good, good time
Stepping out in a new light
We're just having a good time (good time)
In love, I still believe
It's all I ever need
It's the reason that I breathe
I just can't get enough
An old familiar friend
Call it Heaven sent
It never has to end
I still believe in love

SNARLED WHOOPI PIN CUSHIONS, "RUSSIAN PROPAGANDA! LOVE? THIS IS AWFUL! I HATE LOVE. I HATE IT. WE NEED HATE. WE NEED ANGER. IT'S THE ONLY WAY WE WIN! IT'S THE REASON I BREATHE! GO BACK TO RUSSIA, DIANA ROSS. WHY DON'T YOU MARRY PUTIN IF YOU LOVE LOVE SO MUCH! I HATE ALL OF YOU!''

WHOOPI THEN RAN OFF THE SET OF THE VIEW WITH JOY ASKING, "DOES SHE HAVE THE RUNS AGAIN? EXPLOSIVE DUKIE?"

NO, SHE DIDN'T. SHE RAN TO HER DRESSING ROOM AND THEN CAME BACK TO THE SET WAIVING WHAT SHE CALLED A BONE FROM A BLACK CAT WHILE SHE INSISTED SHE WAS DOING A HOO DOO INCANTATION, "SHABLAMIDI SHABLMAIDA SHABLAMIDI SHABLAMIDA."

THESE REPORTERS CALLED HER OUT -- EXCLUSIVE MUST CREDIT BULLY BOY PRESS & CEDRIC'S BIG MIX & THOMAS FRIEDMAN IS A GREAT MAN & ANN'S BIG MIX -- AND POINTED OUT THAT SHE WAS WAIVING A KFC CHICKEN DRUMSTICK, NOT THE BONE OF A BLACK CAT, AND SHE WASN'T CHANTING AN INCANTATION, SHE WAS SWIPING FROM THE CHORUS SING-ALONG ON DONNA SUMMER'S ''STATE OF INDEPENDENCE.''

IN RESPONSE, WHOOPI BARED HER TEETH, HISSED AND MADE CAT-CLAW GESTURES WITH HER HANDS BEFORE SCREAMING, STOMPING HER FEET AND URINATING ON THE STAGE.

IN OTHER NEWS, NANCY PELOSI HELD A PRESS CONFERENCE TODAY TO EXPLAIN THAT ALL MONEY NEEDED TO GO TO UKRAINE.

PICTURED BELOW AT HER PRESS CONFERENCE (Isaiah's THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS "We Feed Them") THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE EXPLAINS HER PLAN.

AND NANCY'S PLAN? TO GIVE EVERY DOLLAR -- EVERY U.S. TAX DOLLAR -- TO UKRAINE. "THAT WAY,'' SAYS NANCY, '' WE CAN GET TO THE REAL WORK NEEDED -- GUTTING THE SAFETY NET!"

FROM THE TCI WIRE:

Enter JACOBIN and Saif Ansari -- the latter of whom bill shimself as "Philosopher, lawyer and writer. Indian American/Muslim atheist." SOmeone break it to the idiot that Muslim isn't a race, it's a religion so, if you bill yourself as an aehist, you're not a Mulsim. Basics are hard for Saif as he makes clear when writing about Iraq for Jacobin -- a place he doesn't normally cover but apparently someone at JACOBIN felt that the piece was needed and theyf armed it out to Saif as one of the non-White guys they actually have working at JACOBIN. Isn't that just another form of colinialism?

At any rate, Saif starts out his piece slamming US President Joe Biden which is more than fair. Joe is president and the war continues under his watch. Joe supported the war in the US Senate. And then, the whole thing quickly falls apart. The first section with huge pro lems:

And yet not even during the heated final debate of the primaries in 2020 did Bernie Sanders (who had voted against the invasion in 2002 as a representative of Vermont) make the case — which he had alluded to on the campaign trail more than once — that Biden was unfit to serve as president because of what was, in Sanders’s view, “the worst foreign policy blunder in the modern history of the United States.”

Elizabeth Warren, another candidate who had called the Iraq War a mistake, also failed to challenge Biden’s historical defense of the invasion — from denying that he had ever believed Hussein possessed WMDs to lamenting that the only mistake he had made was to trust the Bush administration. When asked whether Biden was to blame, Warren — a legal academic who had begun her political career taking on the president over the 2005 bankruptcy bill — demurred.

In fact, the most strenuous criticism against Biden’s role in the Iraq War was leveled in March 2020 by an air force veteran who accused Biden of having the blood of fellow service members on his hands. But despite his overtures that he had come to regret his support for the war — which became increasingly unpopular in the upper echelons of the Democratic Party in subsequent years — Biden never learned from his mistake.

Eleven years after the intervention in Libya’s [. . .]

Tulsi Gabbard? Isn't that the name that belongs in the above? Yes, it is. Caling Tulsi out for fake assery isn't a popular move. We don't worry about popularity here. We worry about the truth. SO we won't just be Abby Martin saying her name on a JaACOBIN podcast and then laughing. No, we'll actually go there as we did in real time. In the final debate that candidate Tulsi made the stage for, we were all expecting the big showdown. This was anti-war Tulsi. She'd played that anti-war arm chair zealot over and over. And the war, she'd tell voters over and over, was her biggest issue. It effected everything -- including how much money we had to spend on other issues -- needed issues.

Bill de Blasio and others had confronted Joe during the debqtes of the candidates for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination. Tulsi hadn't. And she had an excuse, she wasn't on the stage with him. The field was so crowded back then that they had to divide them up into groups.

So she'd go on MSNBC, for example, on June 26, 2019 and slam Joe for his actions regarding Iraq but she wasn't on stage with him.

But Wednesay, July 31st, she was finally on stage with Joe Biden. And big talking Tulsi, whose big issue was the war, was on stage with Joe Biden who voted for the IRaq, War, who did a pre-war hearing that was stakced with war supporters though Joe tried to pretend it was fair and balanced, the man who voted over and over to keep funding the war, the man whod efended it over and over (despite his 2019 lie that he had turned on the wr the minute bombs started ropping). Here was Tulsi's chance to finally take the fight to Joe.

It was going to be an epic throwdown, right?

Wrong.

We recounted it at lenght and repeatedly over and over. For example, see the next day's snapshot.

Joe Biden was on the ropes. He was struggling and he could have been eliminated that night. If Tulsi had done the job she should have, he could have been out of the primary.

But instead, she decided to take out Kamala Harris. Jimmy Dore rightly points out that Kamala ended up without any support at all. Throughout the entire thing, the long process, no one was flacking to her. He's right. But he is someone who has some allegience to Tulsi that is greater than his allegiance to the truth. Now I'll overlook that on Jimmy. He speaks out on many important topics. And I'll defend her from the lunatic attacks from WHoopi Goldberg and others.

But I'm not going to pretend that we saw Tulsi was a whore at the debates.

Read the transcript -- or read the snapshot -- because Tulsi went after Kamala and Kamala was no threat. She was never going to get the nomination. She had no large base of support. Most women did not rally to her. African-Americans in the south did not relate to her.

But Tulsi used her time and her ammo on Kamala. Not on Joe.

Her defenders -- and, sadly, that included BLACK AGENDA REPORT -- would make excuses for her. There was no excuse. Joe Biden was the choice of the establishment and he was being carried by the corporate meid and covered and pimped by them.

She should have taken out Joe.

Sher refused to do so.

If you missed that debate, you may join the liars and insist that she was making statements and -- B.S. That's a damn lie. Jake Tapper was a moderator. He specifically called on her regarding Joe Biden and he was puzzled -- watch his face -- by her remarks which were rescuing Joe and excusing his actions.

He looks like he's wondering if she understood the question. SO he then goes back to her for a second time and is more specific. And Tulsi again takes a pass.

That night, the next day and through the weekend, Tulsi shows up where ever she could on TV and repeatedly insisted that Joe said his vote was wrong and that was good enough for her.

"Pinto Bean Enfrijoladas in the Kitchen"

"No more money for wars"

"That awful magazine (The Nation)"

"War fever"

"Jimmy Dore, Sabby Sabs and Binoy Kampmark"

"THE GOLDBERGS"

"Is Kamala Harris drunk in public?"

"Jimmy Dore and Mike Whitney"

"Idiot of the Week"

"We destroy everything"

"Cynthia says check this video out"

"Dick jokes? Psaki's got dick jokes?"

"Trashy Taraji"

''THE CONVO COUCH and Richard Medhurst"

"JFK SECRETS"

"Burisma, Zelensky And Hunter Biden's Ties To Neo Nazi Funder"

"Ukraine Bombs Donetsk, Left Rehabilitates Hitler, TikTok Influencers Recruited for Propganda"

"Mysterious Death of Reporter Dorothy Kilgallen & the JFK Assassination"

"CONVO COUCH"

"Streamers: Rising costs, so-so content"

"Those awful WONDER YEARS"

"WIll Smith be trippin'"

"Weekend Box Office"

"SCREAM"

"Aimee Mann"

"Jack White and vinyl"

"Good for Dolly"

"Smokey Robinson"

"Music (Blondie, Tom PEtty, Pat Benatar, Fleetwood Mac, Barbra Streisand)"

"Con artist Jussie"

"That hideous Democracy Now!"

"Dangerous Visions: Wild Seed: Reflecting on the work and impact of Octavia Butler"

"Free Julian Assange"

"great roundtable on convo couch and a new report from niccolo soldo"

"Charmed"

"Call Me Kat adds another potential love interest"

"Two from Howie"

"Pskai's all about the peen"

"Not sure if I believe Marlee Matlin now"

"Call Me Kat"

"THE VIEW continues to be called out"

"That disgusting VIEW"

"Jonathan Turley and Chase Rice"

"Give your life for corruption and War Crimes?"

"That Congressional con game"

"As America watches, Jen goes blue"

"THIS JUST IN! JEN PSAKI CAUGHT WORKING BLUE AGAIN!"

Tuesday, March 15, 2022

As America watches, Jen goes blue

BULLY BOY PRESS & CEDRIC'S BIG MIX & THOMAS FRIEDMAN IS A GREAT MAN & ANN'S BIG MIX-- THE KOOL AID TABLE

WHY DOES SHE HAVE TO WORK BLUE?

WHITE HOUSE CLOWN JEN PSKAKI, DESPERATE FOR THE YUCKS, EXCLAIMED TO THE PRESS TODAY OF THE U.S. PRESIDENT, "BIDEN IS A JUNIOR!'' WE DIDN'T NEED THAT, JEN.

WE DON'T NEED IT.

SIZE IS A PERSONAL MATTER.

WHAT'S NEXT, JEN? PRESS BRIEFINGS WHERE YOU TOSS AROUND WANG, PECKER, SCHLONG, DONG, HEAT-SEEKING MOISTURE MISSILE, BALONEY PONY?

WHY DOES JEN ALWAYS HAVE TO WORK BLUE?

AMERICA DESERVES A LITTLE MORE CLASS FROM THE COUNTRY'S WACKY REDHEAD.

FROM THE TCI WIRE:

Starting with the Ausrlaian journalist that US President Joe Biden continues to persecute. Juilian Assange committed the 'crime' of exposing US War Crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan. Joe Biden wants him to stand trial in the US for practicing journalism. Blustering, bigoted Biden wants Julian to pay for telling the world the truth. Joe most recently -- his State of the Union address -- was caught lying again about how many times he himself had visited Iraq and Afghanistan (doubling the total) so, you understand, Joe will always be on the side of liars and always want to punish those who tell the truth.

He is demanding that the United Kingdom turn over Julian who remains in a British prison because, well, they have no reason to hold him in the UK but like good little serfs, they do what the US government tells them.

Victoria Lindrea (BBC NEWS) reports:

The Supreme Court has refused to allow Julian Assange his latest appeal against extradition to the US.

A court spokesman said Mr Assange's application did not raise "an arguable point of law". The decision is a major blow to his hopes to avoid extradition.

The Wikileaks founder, 50, is wanted in the US over the publication of thousands of classified documents in 2010 and 2011.

His lawyers said he had not ruled out launching a final appeal.

The case will now go back down to District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, the original judge who assessed the US's extradition request.

Haroon Siddique and Ben Quinn (GUARDIAN) add:

Assange’s lawyers will have four weeks to make submissions to the home secretary before her decision. There also remain other routes to fight his extradition, for instance by mounting a challenge on other issues of law raised at first instance that he lost on and have not yet been subject to appeal.

The attempted appeal to the supreme court was specifically on the issue of the US assurances.

In January last year, district judge Vanessa Baraitser blocked extradition on the basis that procedures in prisons in the US would not prevent Assange from potentially taking his own life.

But that decision was overturned by two senior judges, Lord Burnett of Maldon, the lord chief justice, and Lord Justice Holroyde, at the high court. Burnett said the risk of Assange being held in highly restrictive US prison conditions was “excluded by the assurances which are offered. It follows that we are satisfied that, if the assurances had been before the judge, she would have answered the relevant question differently.”

Responding to the supreme court’s decision, a spokesperson for Assange’s solicitors, Birnberg Peirce, said: “We regret that the opportunity has not been taken to consider the troubling circumstances in which requesting states can provide caveated guarantees after the conclusion of a full evidential hearing. In Mr Assange’s case, the court had found that there was a real risk of prohibited treatment in the event of his onward extradition.”

Thomas Scripps (WSWS) observes:

Assange’s life is in grave danger. Neither appeal is likely to be granted and not even such formal legal rights and processes to proceed should be considered a certainty.Assange’s prosecution has always been the “legal” continuation of a lawless assassination-cum-rendition operation organised by the CIA, seeking to silence Assange for good, one way or another.

The timeline has now been dramatically accelerated. The Supreme Court’s decision came suddenly, without any prior announcement. That it refused even to hear Assange’s case is highly unusual. The lower High Court certified on January 24 that a “point of law of public importance” had been raised by Assange, normally prompting the Supreme Court to consider the appeal.

The point of law in question was, “In what circumstances can an appellate court receive assurances from a requesting state which were not before the court of first instance.” Even on these limited grounds, the case was considered worth examining by the High Court and legal experts in the field.

Last month, WikiLeaks cited a report of the case by the highly regarded London law firm Bindmans which noted, “Extradition practitioners largely welcome Supreme Court guidance on this point as late assurances designed to alleviate the court’s concerns about human rights violations following extradition have become a highly contentious issue, especially when provided by States with a poor record in human rights themselves.”

However, having been given the option to go through the motions and apply the Supreme Court’s legal imprimatur to Assange’s effective rendition, the justices instead delivered a one-line rejection: “The court ordered that permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law.”

The meaning is clear: the time for charades is over, Assange must be dealt with quickly.

This was a decision reached at the highest levels of the British state, delivered by the President of the Supreme Court Lord Reed and the Deputy President Lord Hodge, alongside Lord Briggs. The NATO-Russia war being waged through the proxy conflict in Ukraine, moving ever closer to a direct military confrontation between nuclear armed powers, has doubtless come as a powerful spur to action, underscoring for the ruling class why Assange must be silenced.

Binoy Kampmark (DISSIDENT VOICE) observes:

Dismay at the decision was expressed by Amnesty International’s Deputy Research Director for Europe, Julia Hall. “The Supreme Court has missed an opportunity to clarify the UK’s acceptance of deeply flawed diplomatic assurances against torture. Such assurances are inherently unreliable and leave people at risk of severe abuse upon extradition or other transfer.”

The next stage in this diabolical torment of the WikiLeaks founder involves remitting the case to Westminster Magistrates’ Court, which will only serve a ceremonial role in referring the decision to the Home Secretary, Priti Patel. Only the most starry-eyed optimists will expect extradition to be barred. (Patel is fixated with proposed changes to the UK Official Secrets Act that will expansively criminalise journalists and whistleblowers who publish classified information.) The defence will do their best in submissions to Patel ahead of the decision, but it is likely that they will have to seek judicial review.

In the likely event of Patel’s approval, the defence may make a freedom of press argument, though this is by no means a clear run thing. It will still be up to the higher courts as to whether they would be willing to grant leave to hear further arguments. Whichever way the cards fall, this momentous, torturous journey of paperwork, briefs, lawyers, and prison will continue to sap life and cause grief.

The persecution of Julian is a threat to the press and not just members of the US press. Julian is not an American citien. He cannot be guilty of treason. No foreigner can be. His actions did not take place on US soil. He published the truth and that, according to Joe Biden, is not a defense. A foreign journalist published the truth and now the US government attempts to destroy the journalist. It sends a dark and disturbing message to journalists around the world. And the US makes clear that for all its pretense about caring for a free press and being appalled by the way other governments attempt to supress journalists is just a pretense. I wonder what 'high tonal' remarks Harvey Weinstein's whore Meryl STreep will have to make about the press now? While she had that bad film to promote she pretended to care about journalism and support a free press. But note that the whore hasn't said a word about Julian. Not surprising when we know her response to the truth about Harvey coming out was to insist to Ronana Farrow that he msut not expose Harvey because Harvey donates to Democratic Party causes.

RECOMMENDED: "

"Jimmy Dore and Mike Whitney"

"Idiot of the Week"

"Our corrupt Congress and guess who has a bio weapons lab"

"SUPERMAN AND LOIS"

"What did Toad Gitlin do for us lately?"

"War fever"

"Banana and Egg Cake in the Kitchen"

"BBQ Ribs in the Kitchen"

"Cuban Beans and Rice in the Kitchen"

"Recipes and The Convo Couch"

"Give your life for corruption and War Crimes?"

"That Congressional con game"

"Chase Rice "Key West & Colorado""

"Free speech, a thing of the past?"

"Amy Klobuchar's trying to destroy the internet"

"Weekend Box Office"

"SCREAM"

"DISNEY's really bad move"

"In his final chapter, Sam Elliott plays homophobe"

"Weekend Box Ofice"

"Not sure if I believe Marlee Matlin now"

"Call Me Kat"

"Jussie gets sentenced"

"10 Favorite Diana Ross Albums"

"Call Me Kat -- 2 problems"

"Sabby Sabs, are you trying to be stupid? (NSFW)"

"Free Julian Assange"

"Naomi (The CW)"

"Samuel L. Jackson is so bougie"

"Jamie Dornan's The Tourist"

"Homophobe Sam Elliott"

"Good for Dolly"

"Smokey Robinson"

"Music (Blondie, Tom PEtty, Pat Benatar, Fleetwood Mac, Barbra Streisand)"

"AMERICAN DAD and Klaus"

"THE TOURIST"

"Ukraine Bombs Donetsk, Left Rehabilitates Hitler, TikTok Influencers Recruited for Propganda"

"Mysterious Death of Reporter Dorothy Kilgallen & the JFK Assassination"

"Women's History Month"

"Unseen Ghost: The CIA and the JFK Assassination (2004)"

"Former CIA Director Reveals How Operation Dragon Lead to JFK Assassination"

"paul newman"

"great roundtable on convo couch and a new report from niccolo soldo"

"the gay gaston and electronic intifada"

"Aretha Franklin's SPARKLE"

"Kamala never sealed the deal and never will"

"WILL & GRACE"

"TV: A streaming pile of garbage"

"Old man Joe doesn't fear the future, he knows he won't be around"

"THIS JUST IN! JOE HAS SOME THOUGHTS -- ALL OF THEM CONFUSED!"

Sunday, February 27, 2022

Old man Joe doesn't fear the future, he knows he won't be around

BULLY BOY PRESS & CEDRIC'S BIG MIX & THOMAS FRIEDMAN IS A GREAT MAN & ANN'S BIG MIX-- THE KOOL AID TABLE

OLD MAN JOE IS OFF HIS ROCKER AND THE WORLD SEEMS DETERMINED TO GO SENILE WITH HIM. IN LAS VEGAS, IDIOTS PRETEND THEY'RE DOING 'FREEDOM FRIES' BY POURING OUT VODKA WHAT KIND OF AN IDIOT POURS OUT BOOZE?

AS CODESTINK RUSHED TO PROTECT OLD MAN JOE AND HIS OLD MAN SCROTUM, OTHERS NOTED THAT, AS USUAL, HE HAD NO PLAN AND THAT HE WAS PUTTING THE WORLD AT RISK.

PRESSED FOR COMMENT AS HE RETURNED TO THE WHITE HOUSE ON TRYKE FORCE ONE (THE WHITE HOUSE'S DESIGNATED TRICYCLE FOR JOE), BIDEN INSISTED, "WHO ARE THEY TO QUESTION ME? I'M THE PRESIDENT OF AAA. JUST WAIT UNTIL THEY HAVE A FLAT TIRE AND NEED ME."

CORRECTED BY SOME OF THE PRESS OUTSIDE THE WHITE HOUSE, JOE SCRATCHED HIS HEAD AND DECLARED, "PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES? THAT DOESN'T SEEM RIGHT? ANYWAY, IT'S NOT LIKE I INVADED POLAND, RIGHT? THAT WOULD BE A BAD THING, RIGHT? WHY IS EVERYONE SO SILENT? IS POLAND IN UKRAINE? ANYBODY WANT TO FEEL WHAT'S LEFT OF MY LEG HAIRS?"

FROM THE TCI WIRE:

Starting with THE CONVO COUCH.

Fiorella Isabel: There is a tendancy on the left that's been exploited by the intelligence community where they exploit people's emotions and they exploit this need to feel good about being on the right and moral side -- which is a good thing: to want to be a good person. But what happens is, it's not coming from a place of actually wanting to get to the bottom of the situation, to get to the truth. It's coming from a place of wanting to feel self-righteous about this. And so what happens is the intelligence community has been exploiting that.

At The World Can't Wait's website, Debra Sweet writes:

It's no exaggeration to say that the showdown between Russia and the U.S./NATO bloc has profound dangers for the people of Ukraine. Millions are already facing death and displacement from the immediate incursion of the Russian military. Russia doesn't want NATO at its borders in its mission to control Eastern Europe.

Many hundreds of millions more are endangered by the U.S. missile launchers recently installed in Poland and Romania, on the border of Russia. These are MK 41's, the same weapon the U.S. used thousands of times on people of Iraq, Syria and Yugoslavia. The U.S. wants to encircle Russia with NATO countries in its mission to maintain imperialist dominance.

Claiming the "high ground" by imposing sanctions, as the U.S. is doing, is not done to avoid war. It's aggression, part of making war, with potential devastating consequences, as we saw in years of deadly sanctions on Iraq, when an estimated 500,000 children died of hunger and lack of medical care.

Two of the major nuclear powers - the U.S. has 6800 and Russia has 7000 according to Time - are faced off in close quarters. Anything, accident or otherwise, could tip off a nuclear exchange. We've recently learned more about how close nuclear war was in the 1962 missile crisis over Cuba due to misunderstanding, and then averted by decisions of lower level commanders.

Democracy Now reported this morning that small groups and single people with signs against this war are appearing in Russia, and being arrested when discovered.

We should be as visible as possible in protesting the actions of both the U.S. and Russia. A protest has been announced Saturday, March 5 in Times Square, NYC. 3:00 pm. Look for protests near you or organize one. Contact us for help. Stay tuned!

Margaret Kimberley Tweets:

GW Bush invaded Iraq and killed at least 500,000 people. Obama’s 2014 coup against the Ukrainian president set the disaster into motion. And let’s not forget what he did to Libya.
If you call Putin a thug, psychopath, or war criminal, you should say the same about those two.

6:42 PM · Feb 24, 2022

Joe Biden is pushing a war that the US has no interest in. Corporations have an interest in it. And their lackeys do as well. I'm reading a pice by someone who is a big disappointment. It's all over the net and as shameful as Amy Goodman's 'coverage' this morning. A lot of whores have been paid off. Back to the awful column, the headline represents one thing -- a condemnation of war. The colum itself? Putin bad and evil -- that's what the whole point it.

I'm not into your bulls**t.

Every time you go off on Putin, you justify war against Russia. Stop pretending otherwise.

You think you're being 'fair'? No, I don't believe that you do. You know what you're doing. You're justifying war and you're actively making the decision to be a tool of war. That you're a member of CODESTINK shouldn't surprise us.

Not one bit.

Putin is Putin. Whatever that is. An dthe region can elect how to respond. The US has more than enough wars and shouldn't be pimping anymore.

I don't care what Putin is or isn't. I know he's a politician and I don't worship them. I don't think they're heroes. I think they're crooks, I think they're rapistst -- and I mean that literally -- and I think they destroy everything they touch.

US President Joe Biden is not drawing a line between Putin and the Russian people. In his blustering speech, he spoke of bringing Russia to its knees, of punishing the Russians.

Maybe Col Ann Wright could write about that next time instead of the dopey crap that she's passed off as anti-war.

All her grabage column is? A justification for war.

That's what she wrote, that's how it will be read, "Even CODESTINK's Ann Wright says Putin is evil . . ."

She's not that stupid. She knows what she did and she meant to do it.

I have no use for these people.

War is wong and war is unneeded. The US does not belong in what's taking place and we have neither the bodies nor the money to send.

Do not, Joe Biden, portray yourself as some benefactor who cares while, at the same time, you speak of bringin the Russian people to their knees.

"Ukraine: Questions for the US Anti-War Movement w/..."

"Russia & Ukraine PEACE Deal BLOCKED By Joe Biden"

"State of Chernobyl Plant And The Potential Danger ..."

"Unseen Ghost: The CIA and the JFK Assassination (2..."

"This Changes Everything"